• ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what I love about the fediverse. On the Lemmy side we’ve seen it in action with lemmygrad. Private platforms need moderators to do that, which let’s be real, doesn’t generate enough profit to be worth their time…

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm, Twitter used to at least try before. Advertisers don’t like Eat Fresh! Running below a nazi tweet. There are at least some market forces keeping them at bay, which is why their social platforms keep failing.

      Nothing Beats communities that are willing to oust bad elements, though

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy world just removed their non-discrimination clause and one of the admins is (poorly) justifying it in a thread about it. I wouldn’t cheer quite yet.

      • Yote.zip@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is only a problem because lemmy.world has become one of the centralized hubs for Lemmy, which means that jettisoning them has a larger impact. The failing of lemmy.world is a reminder that we should be intentionally spreading out to smaller instances, that way a bad admin/instance can be cut off without losing much value. Additionally, by lemmy.world/lemmy.ml/etc having such a grip on the core of Lemmy, they are emboldened to make bad changes without fearing consequences.