• leehouse@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No guarantee that the Packers plan at receiver works out, and there have been plenty of rough stretches this year, but I’ll take cheap, developing, and young over expensive, old, and bad.

    • theskittz@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. With Lazard, The whole “yeah it’s 40 million but he’s a good blocker” copium from the preseason was astounding to me.

      • Hog_and_a_Half@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only the first two years are guaranteed.

        It’s a short term deal that they can get out of, and it’s really not too far off what other WR3-tier players are getting in FA, which I think Lazard is.

        Not a good deal, but not as bad as people are making it out to be.

        • Sir_Carrington@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brother, Lazard was a healthy scratch. The guy didn’t even make it to Christmas, it is as bad as people are making it out to be