While Russian pilots were managing to support land operations in the south of Ukraine, they were doing so “without decisive operational effect,” the British Ministry of Defense said in its daily intelligence update on Monday.

To compensate, Russia was sending adapted free-fall bombs into Ukrainian territory. However, these had “yet to demonstrate consistent accuracy,” it added.

“Over the summer, Russian tactical combat aircraft have typically carried out over 100 sorties a day, but these are almost always restricted to operating over Russian-controlled territory due to the threat from Ukrainian air defenses,” the update said.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine has been able to gain air superiority in the war so far despite Russia’s vastly larger air force. But a military expert previously told Insider that the “advantage is with defense.”

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    soviet union was preparing for war against NATO. as such, they have seen how important air assets were in vietnam war and especially later in desert storm, so they made sure they have loads of SAMs to negate this advantage. both Ukraine and russia draw from these stockpiles making air dominance impossible for either side, airspace is simply denied in all important sectors

  • interolivary@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly I was expecting the headline to go in a totally different direction, something like “Russia’s air force is barely able to leave its own airspace because of poor maintenence, parts and munitions shortages, and widespread alcoholism among flight crews”.

    Considering they’ve resorted to lobbing glide-modified free fall bombs, I wouldn’t be surprised if some of this actually was due to stockpiles getting so low that they can’t use guided munitions for anything but very high value targets (such as maternity hospitals and residential buildings)

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, it’s cheaper to use empty old aircraft to bomb places than it is to shoot down said aircraft. It’s a tactic to waste the anti air defence.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, the Russian master strategists who are already running into serious issues with their airframe lifetimes and lack of experienced pilots are now flying sorties with unguided munitions because they want to get shot down.

        No, a plane - including wear and tear on the airframe & power plant if it doesn’t get itself tactically shot down to “waste enemy AD resources” - and a pilot are absolutely not worth less than a few air defense missiles. And no, they’re not using “empty” planes

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’re the vatniks gonna say next?

          “Actually, it’s cheaper to send underequiped mobniks into battle than it is to shoot them. It’s a tactic to waste Ukrainian small arms ammunition”

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “They’re doing it on purpose” has to be my #1 favorite excuse for Russia’s poor performance. Like, it acknowledges that something seemingly non-optimal is happening, but turns out it’s actually some sort of wildly ingenious plan that only looks stupid.

            Still waiting for those super duper secret reserve elite troops with 999999999 T-14s and Su-57s to show up and mop the floor with the Ukrainians, like I’ve been promised for way too long now

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      On paper they’re well equipped. But Russia is a country that basically operates on corruption, everyone is on the take, so by the time the resources finally get to the military personnel they’ve gone through several thieving hands and pretty much everything of value has disappeared. And you could say that many Western democracies are equally as corrupt, but they’re not, they may skim a little off the top but they’re not stupid enough to steal from their own military.

      No one tells Putin this of course because they’re terrified of him, so he starts operating on the assumption that the military have certain resources that are simply not present.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People really don’t appreciate the depth of the corruption and grift in Russia. In the military (and not just there, mind you) every level participates in it: they sell the gear they’re assigned if they ever get it in the first place, lie about the number of people in command so they’ll get a higher budget which will get embezzled, lie about training their unit because training is hard work and they might not actually have the personnel for it, steal from either the others in their unit or from the ones under their command, and so on and so on. Add to that the absolutely insane violence they subject each other to that kills and drives to suicide hundreds per year (dedovshchina) and it paints an extremely Russian picture. It’s a great and developed country on paper, but there’s a reason why so many countries surrounding them hate their guts and thinks they’re generally untrustworthy and violent