First one was soft but I can understand VAR not intervening as it wasn’t a clear and obvious mistake.

The second one was even softer so I don’t understand why VAR decided to intervene in that one if they didn’t want to intervene in the first one.

If the ref doesn’t give a very soft penalty then why is VAR sending him to the monitor to look at a slow motion replay from one specific angle? It’s like they forgot the “clear and obvious” line after the first penalty or just decided not to apply it in the second instance.