archive.today and archive.ph (also .is, .md, .fo, .li, .vn) could be Russian assets.
They’re also DDOSing a blogger who investigated them.
- 45 Posts
- 5.37K Comments
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•(April 30, 2026) The Onion’s plan to take over Infowars is once again in jeopardyEnglish
20·4 个月前AJ won’t give up. Ever. This - not just the site but the narrative he developed around the trial and the attention he gets for it - is his livelihood, he needs to keep it up no matter how ridiculous, petty and pointless.
I hear it’s only a small, partial win anyhow.
No matter for AJ: one more time he’s getting media attention.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
World News@lemmy.world•Trump warns Taiwan against declaring independence after China talksEnglish
16·4 个月前He cannot retain information for longer so whatever the last person he talked with said that’s what he’ll repeat.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
politics @lemmy.world•China changes Marco Rubio’s name to say ‘stupid’
21·4 个月前What is the diplomatic fix?
And how did they change his name?
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Maybe we shouldn't keep giving resources to billionairesEnglish
29·4 个月前Thank you themattylee, that was perfect.
Add to that the very palpable effect “Not Socialism” has on the country right now…
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK that every single thing Donald Trump is doing was predicted in this article published right before the election
3·7 个月前I meant it from the POV of 2021, so “wins again in 24”
Really depends on how old Sadie is. 6? Hilarious! 12? Ouch. I’m going to cry later.
Usually (ime) it’s just another cumfy chair like the one she’s sitting on. Never had a chaise longue, nor have I ever seen one. Maybe 100 years ago, but nowadays it’s a cartoon thing.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
politics @lemmy.world•‘They Couldn’t Break Me’: A Protester, the White House and a Doctored Photo
7·7 个月前While President Trump and the White House regularly circulate imagery altered by artificial intelligence, including demeaning and racist deepfakes, it is usually so over the top that the goal seems more about cartoonish mockery than outright deceit.
The photograph of Ms. Levy Armstrong was different. It has the hallmarks of brazen disinformation from the top level of government: smearing and humiliating one citizen in order to influence public opinion, while sending a warning to other critics to beware of crossing the administration.
Remember this when they say “libruls cant take a joke”
a misleading description of Ms. Levy Armstrong as a “far-left agitator”
lol, everybody who doesn’t lick The Don’s boots thrice gets that moniker.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•Sony Patents System to Generate AI Podcasts in the Voices of Your Favorite PlayStation Characters - IGNEnglish
6·7 个月前Elon Musk was a trendsetter!
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
politics @lemmy.world•The US government is trying to make coal seem cute. It isn't. | Trump complained that coal needed better PR. Then “Coalie” showed up.
1·7 个月前Big Oil, coal and other shit have been worming their way into US education for decades, spreading lies, esp. against climate and environmental action. I once listened to a long podcast about this, interviewing parents etc. It was very interesting, and very depressing.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK that every single thing Donald Trump is doing was predicted in this article published right before the election
70·7 个月前In 2024, everything was already laid out for everybody to see clear as day - Trump1.0, MAGA’s behavior since 2021, Project 2025…
BTW, in 2016, both Mary Trump and Tony Schwartz predicted Jan 6 21: “If he loses the next election, he won’t go willingly.”
Ever since Jan 6 21 it’s been crystal clear where this goes if he wins again.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•The upgrade argument for desktops doesn't stand up anymoreEnglish
71·7 个月前You nailed it, except “huge generalization” is actually being generous. The article is simply wrong. The author is speaking esoteric technobabble:
The upgrade death spiral (…) happens because upgrading one component of your computer can unbalance the system.
It’s the sort of argument a husband might give his not tech savvy wife when she asks why he repeatedly needs to spend so much $$$ on something only he uses.
I think FOMO says it pretty well, or simply consumerism.
Now that hardware is getting more expensive again, this is really sending the wrong message.
And OP keeps doubling & tripling down despite basically every comment disagreeing. I think they wrote that article.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•The upgrade argument for desktops doesn't stand up anymoreEnglish
7·7 个月前Aye.
And OP is doubling down.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•The upgrade argument for desktops doesn't stand up anymoreEnglish
4·7 个月前Not sure what “future proof” means, but my PC still has its original case from Windows Vista times, has seen 2 mobo replacements, 1 PSU replacement, and I don’t even know how many hard drive / SSD additions / swaps. RAM extensions too. Used to have a GPU but after the 2nd mobo/CPU replacement I dropped it.
Different screens, keyboards, and mice.
None of this would have easily been possible on a laptop.
In a world where hardware is getting more expensive again you are really sending the wrong message here.
Not to speak of environmental impact & consumerism.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•The upgrade argument for desktops doesn't stand up anymoreEnglish
18·7 个月前CPUs are the same with real performance needed a new chipset and motherboard. At that point you are replacing the whole system.
I find the quoted statement untrue. You still have all peripherals, including the screen, the PSU, and the case.
You can replace components as and when it becomes necessary.
You can add up hard drives, instead of replacing a smaller one with a larger one.
Desktop mobos are usually more upgradeable with RAM than laptops.
There’s probably more arguments that speak against the gist of this article.


















What could go wrong ™