It’s the opposite of what you’re saying though. The Commission ultimately decided to use the same rules to arrive at the punishment that every other club is currently subject to.
The relevant section of the report is section 13: “Sanction principles - The Premier League’s proposed formula”
The Premier League proposed the structured formula to arrive at the punishment for this case, and that is what the articles people are seeing go on about. But the commission declined to use it, saying they will stick to the current PSR rules as they are written.
It does point out that the Premier League could either change the rules, or impose on the Commission that they need to use the new formula, but that didn’t actually happen here.
"We consider that it is not for a Commission to introduce such a structured formula even on a case by case basis. We consider that we are required by the Rules to hear and consider the mitigation, after which we have a wide discretion to impose any of the sanctions listed in Rule W51. If the Premier League wishes to impose a mandatory structured formula on a Commission dealing with PSR breaches, it can do so. In that event the Commission would be required to comply with those Rules. But as things stand at present that has not been done: the Commission has the wide discretion conferred by Rules W50&51.
We therefore decline to adopt the structured formula proposed by the Premier League. We will determine the appropriate sanction according to all the circumstances of the case, including (as required by Rules W50&51) any mitigating factors."
It’s the opposite of what you’re saying though. The Commission ultimately decided to use the same rules to arrive at the punishment that every other club is currently subject to.
The relevant section of the report is section 13: “Sanction principles - The Premier League’s proposed formula”
The Premier League proposed the structured formula to arrive at the punishment for this case, and that is what the articles people are seeing go on about. But the commission declined to use it, saying they will stick to the current PSR rules as they are written.
It does point out that the Premier League could either change the rules, or impose on the Commission that they need to use the new formula, but that didn’t actually happen here.
"We consider that it is not for a Commission to introduce such a structured formula even on a case by case basis. We consider that we are required by the Rules to hear and consider the mitigation, after which we have a wide discretion to impose any of the sanctions listed in Rule W51. If the Premier League wishes to impose a mandatory structured formula on a Commission dealing with PSR breaches, it can do so. In that event the Commission would be required to comply with those Rules. But as things stand at present that has not been done: the Commission has the wide discretion conferred by Rules W50&51.
We therefore decline to adopt the structured formula proposed by the Premier League. We will determine the appropriate sanction according to all the circumstances of the case, including (as required by Rules W50&51) any mitigating factors."