![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/9db8a0da-a640-462d-88f2-51419486bdde.webp)
Snow Crash, anyone?
Snow Crash, anyone?
They are fundamentally different types of vehicles. But putting that aside, if you want to compare the largest payload that each vehicle can transport you wouldn’t just use the pickup truck’s GVWR, you would also include it’s towing capacity. There’s a reason 90% of the time people use a pickup to haul something, they’re towing.
This is why we can directly compare the two vehicles payload capacity.
No, comparing a zeppelin with a pickup will never be a direct comparison.
You’re comparing a pickup truck to a zeppelin, there’s no way to make that apples to apples. If someone needs to move something big with a truck they’re probably going to tow it, not try to load it into the bed.
Because of their smaller and the switch to helium Zeppelin NTs has a miniscule payload capacity at 4200 pounds. To put that into perspective that’s the same payload capacity as a Ford F250.
And that’s only the bed capacity. An F250 can tow over 20,000 lbs depending on the trailer design. Most trucks and SUVs can tow >4200lbs.
Of course, advertisers don’t need to run positive or moral ads, though.
Of course not, they’re the customers so they’re always right. And the “product” is tightly regulated.
Your entire post is calling out Samsung, but don’t smart TV manufacturers show ads?
Can you recommend a manufacturer who doesn’t display ads? It doesn’t help to single out one company if they’re all doing it.
Are you referring to this, or something else?
Several categories like incitement, false advertising and CSAM should not be acceptable “speech”.
In those examples it’s not the speech that’s illegal, there’s a real crime that the speech is part of. False advertising is a form of fraud, but if there’s no fraud involved (satire, humor, education, etc) it’s legal.
If freedom of speech only applies to “acceptable” speech, then it isn’t really freedom of speech.
That was humor? Must have gone over my head, I thought you were being serious.
Not at all. I hope something good happens to you today.
OK buddy, whatever you say.
Sharing your opinion isn’t the same as “forcing your answer.” You can’t expect other people to treat you the way you want to be treated if you aren’t willing to engage in open conversation.
And if this is just a weak attempt at trolling, I’d suggest spending some time on 4chan. They could teach you a thing or two…
“Tribal?” A lot of Democrats supported this, it seems like a rare example of bipartisan cooperation to me. Why do you think it’s an example of tribalism?
I think it’s important to consider other people’s perspectives. What about you, would you agree?
Funny, but don’t you think it’s worth making the distinction?
So maybe it’s less about treating people they way you want to be treated, and more about treating people they way they want to be treated?
There is: the person calling can first send a short text asking if they can call you to talk about ________.