• 2 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • I know one shouldn’t feed trolls, but I’m bored, so here we go.

    Your first statement is kind of just nuts. “Ah yes people are leaving Mexico to come to America just because America is better at soccer” lol

    Your second statement immediately jumps to racism. You didn’t refer to Mexicans at all. You referred to cartel members on cocaine…

    As for “America Bad” I should let you know that when people say our government is fascist or committing atrocities, it’s different than saying America isn’t a rich nation that can afford better quality of life for some of its populace.

    I’m a straight white university student. My quality of life is pretty good, and I’ll be largely unaffected by our government’s actions (until I get shot by a cop at a protest of course). America isn’t bad because it’s a horrible place to live, it’s bad because it’s run by fascist unfeeling idiots and full of racist unfeeling idiots (such as yourself) who support the fascist ones and ignore/delight in the pain of others.



  • Perhaps this is just a projection of a square from a non-Euclidean space in which the lines are in fact straight and parallel.

    I think the 2D surface of a cone (or double cone) would be an appropriate space, allowing you to construct this shape such that angles and distances around geodesics are conserved in both the space itself and the projected view.

    This shape in that space would have four sides of equal length connected by four right angles AND the lines would be geodesics (straight lines) that are parallel.



  • The word for established assumptions is “axioms”

    Definitions are kind of the most fundamental axioms. Abstracting things helps us build with them and they’re true because you say they are.

    We use axioms in models to derive new theorems/information. But that is often what makes us resist changing them. If you build your other assumptions on an axiom, you have to rethink all those assumptions or even throw them out when it gets proven wrong.

    However, attachment to a belief, holding to an assumption even when it’s been proven wrong, is called “delusion” and yeah those beliefs tend to be the most destructive


  • I think by cornerstone, they are referencing that beliefs are assumptions that form one’s model of the world.

    You think by logically building on assumptions. “I remember putting leftovers in the fridge last night, so I don’t need to make dinner tonight” You assume your memories are accurate (or accurate enough) and then build on other things you “know” to construct every thought.

    Sights, sounds, and vibes are a different story. They are called qualia and the raw experience of them cannot be described.

    Think of qualia like the raw data you collect from an experiment. Your worldview is the scientific model you’ve built to describe this data and it rests on both fundamental logic and the beliefs/theories you currently believe in.

    Unfortunately people don’t like having to change their worldview. And when you’ve held a belief for long enough, it becomes foundational to many of your other assumptions. Some people would rather say reality is wrong than change their beliefs.

    The word for a belief that cannot be changed via evidence is called a “delusion” in case you ever want to piss off a religious person who says “nothing can shake my faith” like it’s a good thing.


  • if a belief is a model/theory/assumption that a person will not change regardless of evidence against it, it is by definition a delusion.

    If a belief is an opinion, it is a personal statement. Statements like “Vim is the best IDE” are really conveying the information “I prefer Vim over all others IDEs” which is a true statement.

    If a belief is a hypothesis then the person holding it will accept if it ends up being wrong.

    Only in the first and second cases do people usually place importance on their beliefs, and typically, only the first case leads people to harm others or themselves with no way to convince them to stop.





  • I have memories from when I was 2yo. I can recall the plots and quotes from almost any movie or show I’ve ever seen. Like I watched criminal minds only once almost a decade ago but if I catch any snippet of an episode I can still recall the entire plot and likely a quote or two.

    I have a great memory… unless it is something important

    I cannot remember when I have appointments scheduled this week. Nor can I remember peoples names or things I told myself to remember five seconds ago. If I set something down it basically no longer exists and I will get up to look for it even if I set it right next to me.

    Meds help (ADHD) but still it’s fucking annoying


  • Unfortunately no, also I haven’t really watched much anime (I only know who three of the people on the chart are).

    However, in the non-anime category, the tv show “Hannibal” has two very intelligent characters play this same kind of game of cat and mouse.

    You know who the antagonist is, but the other characters… not so much. So you get the same kind of dynamic where people are talking with Light like he’s a normal person when you know he’s Kira.

    You also get some seriously fucked up mind games between the antagonist and protagonist and get those same moments of “well how is he going to get out of this?” For both of them.

    It’s also like a normal-ish crime TV show. Anyway, good stuff, idk if it’s what you’re looking for but you might like it regardless


  • Disclaimer because I’m about to start defending his intelligence: Light is a horrible person regardless.

    Light’s first slip up is his temper, causing him to act without thinking to kill Lind L Taylor on live TV. In all fairness, until that point he had killed hundreds of people already with zero resistance and if you want people to “know of my existence” what better way to do so than to kill someone on live TV and get away with it.

    The next “mistakes” he makes are in focusing on killing L instead of hiding from him. But really he would rather play a deadly game with L than anything else, and he does play that game intelligently and win despite many unforeseen obstacles.

    Point is, light doesn’t get caught because he isn’t intelligent, he gets caught because he’s more obsessed with power and domination than not getting caught or actually saving the world.

    I mean that’s literally why he’s evil: he’s not trying to fix the world.

    He himself mentions that society just tends to decay and—knowing that he won’t live forever—he must know that killing evil people and trying to keep people in line with fear will not work and will not last. However, he does it anyway because fixing the world is just the excuse he uses to justify his god complex.

    He’s not stupid, he’s just more entertained playing with death than he is doing anything else.


  • “I ate sigma pie and it was delicious!” Sounds like something that’d show up on my university’s YikYak, alluding to eating out a sorority chick from Sigma Pi lol

    Idk if that’s a legitimate sorority, but I know that regardless of the sorority mentioned someone would reply something like “wait till you try a pi phi 😜” and/or someone would say you’re going to get an STD from that particular sorority