

Well, technically, we (Brits/Canadians) all work for the royals.


Well, technically, we (Brits/Canadians) all work for the royals.
The “good old days” implies such things. That’s the meaning of the expression. Hence why people use it to refer to a time they would rather go back to. Because of the implication.


I’d literally tell him to “fuck off I’ll call you Nonce Andrew, and if you threaten me I’ll go to the press and tell them even more shit that will get you in prison, you fucking nonce. Now get on your knees and apologise. And then I’d film it, and send it to the press”


“Oh no,I have fallen on your control rod.”


Red bull gives you scha-wiiiiing!


Unlikely but possible is what I’m hearing.


Extradition and imprisonment.
I think you were just too young to see the flaws. As was I. I didnt hear about Rodney King until I was 13. But it happened when I was 2 years old.
(And it still happens)


This is making me think. Could you theoretically jump out of a plane without a parachute, but a wing suit and skis and successfully land on a downhill slope? If you are well endowed of course.


I think we should reframe the question.
How can we protect adults from the harms of not being able to post meaningless bullshit anonymously to online anonymous strangers we never agree with without sacrificing everyones children’s mental stability?
Maybe put childrens rights before adult rights. Adults had fun and got along fine without social media back before the 2000’s. I refuse to believe that we are no longer capable of that. Especially if it means kids get to to go back to using the internet as a resource for homework and playing outside and using their own imaginations. Adults too.

I think the only way I would be protected from death on a bicycle would be to wear a star of david. If there was even a wiff of anti semitism, they would be punished, but if I’m just a white brit… who gives a fuck.
I invoke my 5th amendment right to silence.


Is Richard Johnson a real name or a codeword?


Ok, so, you responded with anecdotal evidence to someone who said they think tablets are a failure, which I replied to with my own anecdotal evidence. At no point did I say I agree with tablets being a failure. I was just countering your anecdote with my own. You came back at me in a condescending manner. I’m allowed to post my personal observations without being treated like a stone age moron who has never heard of a surface or tablets. So I replied in kind.
You can argue all you want, but thats not going to change the statement, my initial statement “I dont know anyone with a tablet, except for one”, which is all I said.
Personally I think laptops are great for work, programming dealing with 200 emails, having 45 tabs open, and all bloody office apps across two screens at same time, but tablets, great with a cat on the lap on the sofa. Original marketing hype was that anything you can do on desktop you will be able to do on tablet. It’s just not true. And reality. They just smartphones with bigger screens. So from a certain pov, they can be considered a failure. Which in my world, is true.
I made it more realistic.
I wouldnt believe it. Well done Cosmo. Thanks humans.


Yes of course. There are also many types of quantum computer and applications, multiple types of fusion, and cancers.
Well orange cats do have a screw loose.
Bang on point. During this debacle the royals have maintained that it wont affect the larger royal family, because it’s not a family business. While declaring that god appointed them above all else by virtue of being from the royal family. It’s time to get rid of them. And I don’t just mean eject them and let them run with the money and property. Every last penny in reparations. This foreign occupation of the UK has gone on too long.