

It was assumption as well, there’s no way these are actual agents. But then again who knows?
Recovering academic now in public safety. You’ll find me kibitzing on brains (my academic expertise) to critical infrastructure and resilience (current worklife). Also hockey, games, music just because.
It was assumption as well, there’s no way these are actual agents. But then again who knows?
I have done all of these. None of them were a midlife crisis - that was straight fucking.
She was never quiet about this.
In my world policy decisions are built in facts. The references are part of the process by which you build confidence in the policy direction by showing the information on which the policy is based. If those references turn out to be faulty then the policy rationale falls apart.
But we are in the era of vibe governance and they don’t care about facts. They will “fix” the document by selecting a new set of facts that matches the desired outcome. We used to refer to it as “decision based evidence making”.
I can appreciate that. But a 60 Minutes segment is about a four minute read.
So I should start an OnlyFans? You could watch me garden, read, and yell at the TV during hockey games. And occasionally fix stuff.
I think I have finally found a generation gap that I think is real; old people like me would rather read than watch. A lot of my students would rather watch than read.
People who post articles provide a summary of the article. So maybe you should post a video summarizing the video you think we should watch?
Why post a 14 minute video for what is probably a 3 minute read?
Season one of Twin Peaks. Never should have been a season two. I’m ambivalent about Fire Walk With Me. Season 3 was a nice touch.
There would be blood loss to the limbs and nerve damage from any appreciable time strung out like that.
It’s a price tag from Woolco. It looks like it cost $6.xx
I avoided the Wikipedia entry because all of the the examples censor the genitalia. It’s such a strange decision but the inclusion is necessary for this discussion.
In this thread: men who don’t understand women or hair.
I think the more important overlap is in the brain itself. We have known that regions of cortex that register genital stimulation are adjacent to/overlap with the area hat registers foot stimulation since Penfield did the first mapping of cortex in the 1930s.
In answer to “that’s true for perception, but why the excitement for looking” lays in that the homuncular representation is not a simple one. We know that there are multiple homuncululi tied to different types of perception, and there is more modern work that ties the planning and goal systems to the functional centres around key points of the homonculi. The physical closeness of the two is possibly responsible for the mingling of the two representations. Back in the day there was even a mechanism for it - “ephaptic excitation” - where axons running in a bundle could activate neighbouring fibres through changing the ionic composition of the fluid around them.
From the article they are being ridden in protected areas including dunes and bird breeding areas.
They’re rich. She’d get texts in flight.
Well it is during a midlife crisis.