That’s really beautiful

This is one of those things that I never realized how much I wanted and needed it until I just learned of its existence

Wait… you mean lemmy.world? Or something else?

I’m a slow study in the fediverse.

But have you tried CBD? /s

Trans men pretending to be women aren’t women, they’re men.

That’s what you meant, right?

Something about this move makes me feel like he was bragging to somebody about how he managed to own a single letter domain, and his conversation ended up somehow here, with him doubling down on what wasn’t even a good joke to begin with.

This is purely speculative, obviously, but it just makes me think it’s him putting his money where his mouth is to save face to someone else (who is likely bemused at best)

That’s a mother then, not a MILF trope

Incorrect, but I understand the spirit of your argument.

In the adult industry, it doesn’t matter if the age of consent in a certain state is under 18. 18 USC 2257 dictates that no minors can appear in porn and as either a result of that or out of fear of persuction for obscenity law, no US made/distributed porn can legally depict a character having sex who is under 18. State laws are irrelevant, as are laws outside the US, generally, because US distribution is key for sales

That’s conceptually different. You’re taking about why society approves of regarding age differences in dating.

This post is addressing the nuances in legality and plot lines in porn

But you can’t depict a child in a porno, which is the specific case I’m speaking to here. I don’t disagree with you, generally

For me personally? Turns out about 27:20 or 34:21, but individual anecdotes are not good data points

*girl

This is precisely the context I was speaking to

*She, and they are very rarely implied in porn unless it’s in the context of finishing/boarding/imaginary 18+ young adult school.

Pornographers who are above board in any way at all wouldn’t dress a set to imply there is a minor present

I’m focusing on MILF plots in porn specifically, where if the woman is a mother of an infant, they couldn’t ever (nor would they, should they, would anyone want them to) show her with her child as a maternal figure in that role

Absolutely the fuck not. There’s no room at the Inn for whores like me on Meta apps ¯\(ツ)/¯

I was permanently banned from Instagram a few months ago because I’m a pornstar. A lot of industry folks were banned around the same time. In retrospect, I wonder if they were trying to clean up the app ahead of the launch of Threads.

I had experienced temporary bans before over the years, we all had. But losing my account and then having my new account banned again within two days, all without posting anything even approaching NSFW was fucking awful. It really hurt a lot of us financially.

So fuck no, I’m not going to spend my time creating content and IP, posting photos, and engaging with my fans on their new platform. I doubt I could join it anyway.