Serial killers in the same prison might say that it is against the Geneva convention to have a person like him in the same cell block.

I don’t think north Korea would keep him as prisoner. Unlike Otto Warmbier he has no fans or sympathy from anyone, so no Western politician would gain anything from negotiating his release with North Korea.

Would like to have one for my car. It should have intuitive buttons, so I don’t have to swipe on my phone to change to song

That’s a great idea from GitHub user el-sloppo and Claude.

Wait, we can put his ai into an inflatable dummy so people can punch him:

A local website shows article comments to everyone, but to make one you have to subscribe. The comments are mostly boomer rage bait.

I think pretty much all big YouTubers fade away eventually. PewDiePie and Linus Tech tips seem to get fewer views than they had in their prime. Either they get a shitstorm, or quit themselves, or they grow apart from their audience.

The content from 3rd partys might be good, the platform itself is not.

“Wait I think there is someone outside the airlock, we will go and check!”

deleted by creator

The Hong Kong with cheap and reliable public transport?

No; it’s essentially Eugenics for incels, assuming you could determine your “value” by measuring your face, and by working on it having more luck with woman. You pay some looksmaxxer with a broccoli haircut to insult your face, which is something you can get for free anywhere else on the internet. I assume the end goal is that everyone looks the same, so the inner values are finally important again. Also, looksmaxxing is a concept from men, for men, pretending to know what woman like in men. All their “research” comes from other incel and manosphere places on the Internet, but not from actually talking to real woman in the real world. It’s like asking blind people what the best color is.

This is a terrible idea, because it assumes you are only lonely because of looks, and by changing your looks you are suddenly popular. In reality, the people who date others just for their looks are horrible human beings, and will leave you soon for someone younger, or with more money or are just insufferable to be around if you move together. Looks and great sex will fade away as you age, a pleasant and nice personality wont.

I assume you look into it because you are lonely and insecure about yourself. This is normal for young people, but it gets easier as you get older. There are some good tips in here already, but here is what worked for me:

Find some hobby you can do outside with other people, and check your local meetup groups whats popular in your area. Anything that gets you away from a screen and spend time with real people, and maybe learn some new skills or get fit, like cycling, hiking, rock climbing, diving, flying gliders, cooking, maybe dancing. You don’t have to be there to be good at it or find a new hobby to sink all your time and money into, you just go there to meet people and have real interactions with them, and get away from toxic social media. If you find a find a girl you like, you must be a good friend first: be clean, dress well, smell nice, say nice things to her, listen to her, bring her food, spend time with her by going some places she likes, be there if she needs help, talk about things you have in common - for example the hobby where you meet.

I used to live in a big city sharing the flat with other people. While dating your roommate sounds like a good idea and shortcut to regular sex, it might backfire if you break up, or she finds another friend. It’s much better to find out if she has single friends, and if you have skills she recognizes (cooking, fixing things around the house, interesting hobbys) she might introduce them to you.

So you support that the manufacturer relies on stealing data instead of selling a good product to make money?

Let’s not jump to conclusions. Cockpit, 2/5 wings and engines still look good on the picture

The Internet destroys that concept. The good and the bad are one link away, you need constant vigilance and you have almost no help. It’s not healthy to micromanage your children’s media consumption. It’s like helicopter parents who never let their kids free. Setting this as the expectation isn’t healthy.

I agree, but with all the brand recognition, corporate TOS, rules, “kids” section, design, beeping off swear words and restrictions on YouTube it gives most parents the appearance to be a save place.

He will have a space x mars colony by 2016, trust me bro!

Go to your browser settings and click “reject 3rd party cookies”. This will block all cookies, except for the domain you are visiting. But it might break some things and have to readjust for some domains.

Otherwise use ublock and noscript, prevents your browser from loading things you never wanted.

https://youtu.be/tVx2uCcDXX0

Mr mittens, the crime solving cat.

No, not at all. You have 2 encrypted connections A to B and B to C, where B is the proxy server. The proxy server decrypts AB, sees the plaintext traffic to check against rules, then reencrypts the traffic with his own key and forwards it to B to C. Your browser on C sees the proxy servers cert for BC, and the website and proxy handle out a different cert AB. No encryption or cert is broken during the process.

We had a proxy server at work that would route all internet traffic and scan for viruses, blocked urls or other traffic patterns, depending on your network rules. It did work on https and SSL traffic, because you had to accept the cert from the proxy server in your browser. So your traffic was encrypted between proxy and webserver, and proxy and your computer, but unencrypted on the proxy server itself. It would be similar with a VPN. Plus, if you control the browser you could just ship the required certs with the update…