Your quoted segments clearly reference the different criteria (10 acres versus 2.2).

And the word “Michigan” appears exactly once in the article: in the second bit you quoted where it clearly refers to the lake.

What? Where does it say that?

Also, The article mentions Lake Michigan, not the state

They do. If Minnesota and Wisconsin used similar criteria, Minnesota would have something like 40k more.

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/which-has-more-lakes-minnesota-or-wisconsin/

Wisconsin counts large puddles as lakes. If they used the same criteria as Minnesota, they’d have significant fewer than Minnesota.

But I have no holes to poke in your potato statement. Fuck Idaho.

Yeah, South Carolina is definitely not associated with slavery…

Is there a Lemmy equivalent of ForwardsFromGrandma?

I was going to say…with what money is Reddit going to pay these posters? Because they couldn’t turn a profit while relying on unpaid moderators.

It’s completely ass-backwards to pay posters while telling mods to suck it and donate their time.