Despite all my rage I’m still a rat refreshing this page.
I use arch btw.
Credibly accused of being a fascist, liberal, commie, anarchist, child, boomer, pointlessly pedantic, a Russian psychological warfare operative, and db0’s sockpuppet.
Pronouns are she/her.
Vegan for the iron deficiency.
As a trans woman who wears jeans and Ts and feels more at home in a machine shop than a stitch and bitch (although stitch and bitches rock) the narrative that feminine coded behaviour is a necessary and/or sufficient condition for being a trans woman is deeply damaging medicalised bullshit.
Don’t push people to perform cisness or transness, just let them discover themselves.
The sluiced fragments (some of) hairtie for scale.
Not practical, but I want a tiny 3d printed chest of gem rough so for now I’m collecting it all.
Uh tiny fragments of zircon and saph I haven’t sorted yet. A single flec of gold and a metric tonne of magnetite.
Gonna dry the cons and strip out the magnetite and look for more gold, it’s not an area where you expect it though. This was the sand from classifying a few buckets for sapphire. Photo of sieve finds attached, the sluice found similar stuff but smaller.
Without litigating terminology it is true that there are not like single receptor effects, or that there is a potentially fatal rebound. However it does mess with homeostasis in ways that can make it difficult to stop. Sudden cessation can cause difficult sleeping, anxiety, nightmares, appetite suppression, restlessness, and low mood. It’s relatively easy to deal with compared to stuff that messes with gaba, opiod receptors, or dopamine but it’s still much harder than changing what you eat or whatever.
Review from Canadia finds: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2020&q=cannabis+health++review&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_rr=1#d=gs_qabs&t=1731272057908&u=%23p%3DZQNk8wwxTvkJ
Legalization has been associated with increased adult hospital attendances for psychiatric distress and vomiting, unintentional ingestion of edible cannabis products by children and hospitalizations for cannabis use disorders in adults. There is conflicting evidence on whether cannabis‐impaired driving has increased since legalization. There is suggestive evidence that presentations to emergency departments with psychoses and cannabis use disorders may have increased since legalization.
Evidence of slight increases in psychosis, consistent with hypothesis that cannabis can trigger episodes in people with pre-existing conditions. Evidence that taking too much is uncomfortable.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(22)00161-4/abstract
finds that strong cannabis might make mental health worse.
Realistically inhaling it is the most harmful thing if you’re not prone to bad brain.
People have used it for a long time without serious harm but the higher dose modern strains are increasingly associated with stuff like hyperemises syndrome. So uh as with all things enjoy in moderation, we are all but food for worms, it’s probably safer than driving a car or whatever.
huh, this story is really old and of dubious origin but afaict the original websites are down and I can’t be bothered going into archives.
It could be made up. Probably really.
They’re probably studying effects of diet on cognitive function.
I am not sure if you’re being deliberately contrarian to protect cognitive dissonance, or just wildly ignorant of how studies are conducted.
In the most literal sense a study is made of a battery of experiments that are each run across a series of tests. This is also just “an experiment” colloquially since they’re all testing the same area. They do not take rats from say a maze solving study, then give them diabetes for a different study, then give them a brain tumor before putting them in the decapicone (a real product).
I have stolen lab rats marked for death, I know what I’m talking about.
wholesome animal experimentation. So cute and wholesome how they keep them in shitty cages, feed them a bland diet, and kill them the moment the experiment is over.
What a nice story.
Hnngh hnngh yes yes quite the unwashed masses need to be kept far from power hmm yes Tallyho good man hmm hmm.
Once again you come down on the side of facts with admins behaving as reactionaries over veganism.
Here is a press release for the protest as proof I did not post any actual animal abuse.
https://www.peta.org.au/news/peta-barbecues-a-dog-in-a-sydney-shopping-mall/
It’s a photograph of a PETA protest posted to vegancirclejerk which endorses this sort of protest.
The image specifically has the text “vegan” in it, and the dog is a prop.
Given this instance endorses animal abuse for the purpose of food, what are the grounds for the ban? The vcj admin can remove the post if they feel it goes against the community (it doesn’t), people post bodyparts of animals to this instance all the time.
If footage of vegan protests is against the rules, that should be made explicit.
Anything veganism (positive)
Positive, however I cannot post the proof.
Apparently! I cannot post the evidence that it was a dbzero admin.
However I can tell you that they
a) did not understand it was vegan content (says in image)
b) admits vegans are right
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I have been informed since the sent the reason via message neither of us can post it here.
lmfao dbzero terms of service is literally to follow the anarchist COC, hosts Lefty memes, and one of the largest anarchist communities.
World is peak neoliberal, has a stupid media bias bot calibrated for neoliberal positions as centrist, and is explicitly aligned with the USA in law and ethos.
Shitjustworks is similar to world but Canadian.
Life is political and people hosting online communities have ideologies. Shock horror I know. An ideology being invisible to you because you are raised in it does not make it any less explicit.