It is, but in November he’s not voting for Trump, so he can have a clear conscious on that topic, nor can he ever vote for him again unless Trump tries to pull the I can run for 3 terms thing.
If they voted for Trump, they’re probably not bright enough to realize the GOP as a whole is part of it.
“My first vote was for this president, and I regret it, and I’m gonna regret it for the rest of my life,” he added. “Because of me, because of my voting, He got arrested, and he lost his life. And I’m never going to forgive myself for that.”
Odds that in November he
A. Votes GOP
B. Votes Dem
C. Abstains
My guess is still A.
Glad the finally studied it, it was a bit worrying how big some were getting with unclear reasoning.
Its not a shiny in your face thing so people dont care, but its something amazing that happened under him.
They also got their first modem, the C series, as well which is quite an achievement. Already got 2 iterations and a 3rd coming out in 2027.
My obscure site for my small business is getting hundreds of thousands of hits a month and its practically all bots.
When Cloudflare says bots are most traffic nowadays, I believe it based off what I see.
(Not in OP city) There’s a lot of homeless people here and they like to sleep in entranceways and similar things, so you’ll often see gates etc that get closed in front. One business had a open area beside it that homeless people were sleeping in, so they installed rounded spikes on the ground to make the area unusable. Caused a quite a bit of drama with the city.
Sometimes the law is really fucking bizarre hah.
That honestly makes absolutely zero sense…
Transmitting it is illegal.
If creating it is illegal (e.g hand drawn), it is impossible to possess it, and not have transmitted it. Either you created it, or transmitted it, and while maybe they can’t prove one or the other, you broke a law?
Wouldn’t this be more like, writing a computer virus is legal, but using the virus isn’t?
One way around it is we might see legislation require AI watermark generated images. If you have CSAM that isnt watermarked you used software thats against law, or its real CSAM unless you can somehow prove otherwise. If you prove its AI, hit them with the illegal software charge assuming they didnt do any of the other illegal things that can be done with the content (e.g uploading it somewhere)
A watermark law seems like its going to happen.
Edit: and some are starting to watermark of their own choice. Claude is altering text output to make it identifiable, they claim without altering the meaning or intention of its output.
Also the ruling was just about the possession of it, which when it doesnt depict a real person, isnt against the law.
They get people by having pictures of real people OR transmitting it which is strictly against the law even when its all made up.
Given existing laws, if he transmitted it which he is charged with, he will still be found guilty.
The moment it exits or enters your home from outside its transmitting. Transmitting is as simple as going to a website and downloading it, or uploading it to a cloud drive, or even some cloud service to move it between 2 devices you own.
People out there who think they can avoid AI this way are really just delusional. Its everywhere at this point.
If its not in the software you are using, the software that runs the software has it. Or the software that runs the software that runs the software. Its inescapable.
You’re on the internet? Millions of lines of AI code are probably involved in you seeing this message across the entire infrastructure needed to allow this.
When an LLM agent reports a huge security bug and provides the solution and the only solution is explicitly exactly what it wrote.
Checkmate!
Thats wild. The last part about using the savings for their cache, did they mean the CDN type stuff or was that something related to the 1.1.1.1 stuff?
Either way their plans to use the new excess for the cache will further make things faster for everyone.
They also sell access to use the models on hardware.
people start using “tweet” and “twitter” again
I never stopped
Thats definitely a fair take.
Do you think people would have enjoyed the TV show as much though with all the cast changes that would have been required?
I haven’t read the books, but my understanding is that was why, so they could have recurring characters and some continuity.
Edit: and once you do that… well all sorts of shit changes.
but… if it identifies as it, that kinda means we need to let it into the newsroom =(
Death Policy… not too far off from Death Panel. It’s got 1 word. The 2nd word starts with the same letter.