In the future nobody reads “the design of everyday things” apparently
In the future nobody reads “the design of everyday things” apparently
They promise to do it at 7% market share
“the oppressor doesn’t get to tell the oppressed how to protest”
Only tangentially related here but the principle remains
IT NOT DEMOCRACY IT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC HUR DUR (banjo music)
It’s the mass that results in gravity, not the density. A giant cloud of gas will have the same gravitational effects as if it were compressed into its solid phase
This is why the last step of science is broad consensus, which has solved literally every single example of bad science in this entire thread. All this means is people should pay more attention to sources.
What methodology finally disproved that?
Listing so many pieces of bullshit is still bullshit. But if Putin doesn’t like the results of the war he started, he can always leave.
Removed by mod
What took you so long
The only winning move is not to play
Speaking of Russians 🤣
People within the supposedly same religion can’t agree on things all the time. It’s entirely possible that his girlfriend’s version of the religion is nothing like what op would find online, or even more likely, that Apple op would find multiple claims online that disagree with each other.
The thing about religion is if looking at the moon is against a religion, but some senior person in that religion really likes to look at the Moon, it’ll suddenly be allowed.
“The Internet says you can look at the moon”
“Oh that’s regular Navajo. I’m Fundamentalist Navajo. Also, fuck you for arguing with me about my religion. We’re through.”
If I didn’t care I wouldn’t comment. The perspective is materially absurd. Just because you can only change degrees doesn’t mean you can morally abdicate your responsibility to do so.
This is as sad as watching the Terminator try to kill people with a broken gun. Alexa, play “in the arms of the angels”
So what you’re saying, Dad, is it’s nascent and already faster? Gotcha.