Going to be funny if one of Caleb Williams or Drake Maye turn into good NFL QBs and the Bears pass on them and Stroud in back to back years cause they were enamored by Fields.

Its weird that a QB of Field’s natural abilities is the ultimate dink and dunk merchant, but I guess that’s also a byproduct of the players around him?

Got it. Screw what the players want as long as the poor billionaires save some money. I get this argument coming from the owners’ cronies. Never going not be insane to me that regular ass fans do this. But it is what it is. Some people just love to worship owners.

Fans should, no? Do we watch for the players or the owners? We shouldn’t care that the people doing the actual entertaining are not more comfortable? What is the drawback? This literally makes no sense to me. As a fan, what does it matter whether the games are on turf or grass? Why such vehement defense of turf? Even if you are 100% right and every piece of research says there is no difference, what does it hurt you to root for having grass? Are you getting some bonuses or stocks in turf or something?

This is not about a “take” though? This is about the actual people playing on this surface saying they feel better playing on grass than turf. How is that a “take”? Do you go to the doctor and tell them your tummy hurts and expect the doctor to go, “Well that’s just your take”?

And again, I don’t understand what fans gain by rushing to the defense of the billionaire owners. What do you lose by being on the side of the players? If the players say they would rather play on grass, why are we pulling out our financial analyst hats and rushing to save the billionaire owners a couple million dollars by going, “Well the data shows this is a bad take”. It makes no sense.

Does it even matter that much? The players playing on it say they would much prefer playing on grass. Why would fans need to see research to back that up? Aren’t we here to watch the players?