They want different conditions. Soil, drainage, light, humidity, temperature, there’s loads of things plants care about other than “water yes/no”. Look at the plants that have succeeded and find things with similar requirements.

Not outrageous enough, and harder to connect to children as a wild conspiracy. That’s just in the US though, the UK is busy being even more puritanical.

Also, I don’t get why the wingers seem to be so fixated on furries.

They’re obsessed with a narrow band of approved behaviors and anything outside of that is evil. They see it as sexual deviancy and a moral stain on society, and everyone promoting it is obviously the enemy.

Easier time sure, I’m pushing back on your “without hesitation” claim. Lots of recorded cultures have valued respecting nature and not killing or taking needlessly.

By “modern humans” do you mean “anatomically modern” or “21st century modern”? Because it’s not like we’ve just recently invented empathy and cuteness. People have been tolerating asshole animals for a very long time.

I doubt he’s a racist. For one, Samuel L Jackson vouches for him. But mostly the actual content of his works and his obviously provocative choices. He knows how the dialogue makes various characters look and he’s not shy about being rough and edgy to generate the impact he’s looking for. Nobody would ever accuse him of being a subtle filmmaker but he understands humans.

We need to form a 3rd party, enough is enough.

“How Republicans Never Lost an Election Again: The Realities of Vote-Splitting”

Because that’s how the government actually functions? It’s all committees and favors and the longer you’ve been around the more influence you amass. If the progressive arm thought they had the numbers to freeze out the establishment they would be doing so already.

I know plenty of olds that refuse to believe that people are causing it.

I wonder how much it costs every time they stop then start back up again.

As much as they can shovel at their no-bid contractor friends.

Animals benefit from the tactical advantage that humans are generally uncomfortable with killing an animal with their bare hands, even if they’re being obnoxious.

Taxing unrealized gain is wrong in most voters minds.

Property tax is already doing that though.

Sure but every time you stop they’re going to have a new berry, leaf, or bit of bark for you to taste. (It’s me, I’m the one handing you forest treats)

What is “a phrase you’d see on a Hot Topic tee shirt in 2006”?

A lot of them think it’s cool specifically because it annoys other people. It’s antisocial behavior.

And if it was like half the size instead of a pedestrian-killer 6000.

"As voting is compulsory, electors are given a number of ways to cast their vote at an election, including postal voting, pre-poll voting, absent voting, voting at Australian overseas missions and voting at mobile teams at hospitals and nursing homes and in remote localities, as well as ordinary voting at a polling place in their electorate.

Because of the secrecy of the ballot, it is not possible to determine whether a person has completed their ballot paper prior to placing it in the ballot box. It is therefore not possible to determine whether all electors have met their legislated duty to vote. It is, however, possible to determine that an elector has attended a polling place or mobile polling team (or applied for a postal vote, pre-poll vote or absent vote) and been issued with a ballot paper."

https://www.aec.gov.au/about_aec/publications/voting/

If you’re that desperate to prove you’re the purest Anarchist you can just turn in an empty ballot. Or it’s a $20 fine for noncompliance. Or you could, you know, participate in democracy. Authoritarians generally don’t like it when people vote.

but we can’t force people to vote,

We totally could, compulsory voting works i Australia.

That season was such a step down.

I was so excited for the Tesla Roadster in like 2007? It was cool as hell, legitimately groundbreaking. I got to sit in one in Germany. A future car.