Track_Shovel
Fortunately, woodland creatures don’t hire lawyers
- 3.31K Posts
- 3.82K Comments
9·4 days ago
Oof.
It’s easy for me to say what I would do in your situation because I’m not living it.
Since she made this decision, though, she should have to carry the weight. Your job remains the same overall, which is to act as a safety net.
Those social plan she had? Out the window. You have a baby to support now, dear, how is you resume coming along?
Lol. Look at this guy, able to have more than one person interested in him.
Can we just throw people like this off a cliff already?
I wish. I have dug enough pits, I probably have a dead one stuck in my sinuses or something
Woah. Didn’t hear about that. I (nearly literally) live under a rock with some isopods, though, so that might explain why. Turns out two things can be true: you can be a giant piece of shit, and still have the occasional good take, I guess.
FUCK YOU, MORON
(Is that better?)
81·8 days agoThis is only a thing because people forget or ignore the burden of Truth.
If you go against the accepted idea the onus is on you to prove why it’s true.
Next time someone comes at you with a stupid opinion, do what we did decades ago, and laugh in their fucking face.
Make morons afraid again
That and anything even possibly AI generated
Lol. That’s not even big compared to some of the ones around here. The thing has a moderate leveling kit to give it more ground clearance. Douche nozzles around here easily stick on 6 inch leveling kits. Heck, I’ve seen guys take F-650s or comparable, and turn them into pickups.
I don’t get it.
I have newer honda pilot, and that thing is a boat. I only like it because kids + hockey means I need a fair bit of storage space, and it’s great in snow. I drove a Mazda 3 before kids, and was plenty happy in that.
103·11 days agoStop. Please, sir. The joke is already dead!
5·13 days agoI’m the Confucius of shitposting.
If a meme shits in your post, does it make a sound?
We are on (what feels like) our 8th spring thaw
Straight to all my veg ecologist friends
unrelated: that double negative is throwing me for a fucking loop, but the coffee hasn’t kicked in.
I think “It’s unlikely that in a 4 person polycule that at least one of them isn’t nonbinary” is the better way to phrase it. I’m not trying to be pedantic here. I’m just wrestling (aloud) with the structure of the sentence.
Related: Why would a polycule almost always have a non-binary member? I’m not up to date on this stuff, but I could see a bi polycule working, or something like that, with them all aligning with their typical (i use this word lightly, for lack of a better one) gender.