How do you make it safe and inviting while also protecting anonymity?
Some anonymous users are prone to pretty awful behavior, and non anonymous users will be profiled.
How do you make it safe and inviting while also protecting anonymity?
Some anonymous users are prone to pretty awful behavior, and non anonymous users will be profiled.
China filters every byte of Internet traffic in and out of the country.
It seems naive to think they can’t accomplish the same thing for a GitHub mirror.
That’s the whole point of this: they will automatically filter that out, and this is an impotent, though well intended, gesture.
You started here
Personally I think it’s photosynthesis.
Now you’re here
The failure to develop photosynthesis
I think you got it! Good job!
Regardless: photosynthesis is a possible solution to avoid the filter. Not the filter itself.
You can’t filter something in
What do you look for?
Your answer doesn’t make sense.
“Photosynthesis” is a positive development for life. The great filter must be a negative development: it’s a filter or a barrier that keeps life from achieving long term extra terrestrial survival.
So “climate change” would be an answer. Or “fuel depletion” (to which photosynthesis may be a solution). But the filter is the mechanism by which life forms are prevented from progressing.
You’re getting good advice here.
“Bricking” though normally means turning a software problem into a hardware problem. You just have a software problem, which is infinitely easier to fix.
Don’t fret.
Right?
How could primitive humans draw any other conclusion than God from that kind of spectacle!?
We have come so far.
Bones prove you existed.
But the absence of bones does not mean that you didn’t.
Ahh! Cool! Thanks for the explanation.
Is hardlink the same as ln without the -s switch?
I tried reading the page but it’s not clear
I would not be surprised if he goes into alcohol withdrawal in prison and dies.
It’s sloppy imprecision about a really basic detail.
It’s an indictment of his ability to understand what he’s reporting.
There are millions of pages with sloppy reporting about complicated topics
I’m not saying this discovery is important. I’m saying I want to understand it from a more reliable source and that I’m not wasting minutes of my life on this YouTube channel.
It sounds like it all needs liquidation
He starts by calling tryptophan a protein in the first two minutes.
Huge error? No, but sloppy, and there’s too much low quality pop sci on YouTube already to justify more attention to this video.
I would report this on news.ycombinator.com
There are a lot of eyes there and you might be able to find someone who works at proton
Thank you!!
That title is really hard to parse.
I kept trying to figure out whose head got snapped.