Is there a link to the research? Can’t find it

deleted by creator

Will this perhaps set a precedent for future models where authors will be able to price their work differently?

On YouTube?

I’m not following, are you saying the judges are? This administration? All previous administrations and this one?

Was there always a lack of repercussions to illegal actions or were administrations playing nice for the most part?

I’m guessing like with other actions some federal judge will ask to reinstate them when it’s far too late

“According to reports, 22-year-old student pilot named Rosario already had a private pilot license but was still building up her flying hours, meaning she was required to fly with an instructor or safety pilot.”

Probably instrument rating

The result unfortunately is the same. Luckily microg exists, although GOS doesn’t see much valie in it vs sandoxed gapps

What about notifications

I thought for a second they’re emitting CO2, it’s their footprint or the grids energy sources

Fines aren’t the only option for punishment

I still have a hard time finding who is it recommended too. Every western country seems to have a different recommendation

I only see 6 total (not including this one)

Extreme Privacy book author must be celebrating

Except for Iran’s reps not shaking hands I didn’t really understand what was so humiliating. Doesn’t seem to mention the points that “made it clear who’s desperate and who’s not”

Thank you!

During a talk at the Stanford Graduate School of Business in April, he said: “I say to everybody: ‘Move to California. Don’t leave.’ It’s the highest taxes in the world, but it’s OK.”

From the article

I think it sets a precedent

Doesn’t say what the mistakes were, unless it’s obvious it’s the layoffs. Could mean laying off the wrong people but not the quantity.

The language I see is regeneration in mice, less breakdown in humans