How exactly do you define advertising? An overly broad definition would forbid, for example, a dentist from putting a sign in front of their office saying they’re a dentist.

Maybe they shouldn’t be throwing out sieg heils and getting swastika tattoos if they don’t want to be called Nazis.

15 year generations don’t really make sense though, the whole concept of a generation is that they’re the previous generation’s kids.

You have one of each number except 7, and you’re deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.

I prefer Great Value Goebbels.

I don’t think the administration will publicly admit his death. They’ll just deepfake him and claim he can’t make any appearances outside of video communication for national security reasons.

Unless the government collapses in the next 20 years and can’t pay it.

“Why do we eat the fungi that taste good and not the ones that give you explosive diarrhea?”

He’ll probably be allowed to run, but just enough of his votes would mysteriously disappear to swing the election.

My conspiracy theory is it was chosen to deliberately harm the optics of environmentalists. Something with minimal useful impact and maximum inconvenience would turn people against the whole idea of environmentally friendly alternatives.

That’s not how that works. It’s not a DnD sphere of annihilation, it’s an infinitely dense point of matter.

Hopefully we get to see the end of the movie.

He never intended to build the Hyperloop. From the start, it was a lie to shut down a proposed project to build a west coast high speed rail line.

I’m sure if they take power, their first order of business would be to legalize all Nazi symbolism and drop the “we’re just run of the mill conservatives” facade entirely.

The wound predates Reagan and goes back to the Civil War. Sherman had the chance to cauterize it, but he held back and let it fester, and here we are.

That doesn’t matter. The only reason the law has the ability to stop anyone from doing anything is that if you refuse for long enough, eventually, someone will show up with a gun to force the issue. If he knows that won’t happen, he can act with impunity.

Yeah, something about this shift in focus feels like a psyop. We have clear evidence of targeted voter suppression, destruction of ballots, etc. In a two party system, fraudulently removing your opponent’s votes has exactly the same impact as creating fake votes for yourself. That’s already clear evidence of fraud, why are we redefining “evidence of fraud” as a new thing that we haven’t found yet?

So it’s a perfect analogy for conservatives.

Every suppressed vote is as fraudulent as any fake vote.

A lot of Trump voters are horribly uninformed. They didn’t know - and still don’t know - what Project 2025 is. They thought it was fearmongering because they only heard about it from Dems. They have no idea what’s happening right now, nor do they care. All they know is their team won, and they’re otherwise tuned out. Maybe they’ll wake up when they feel the effects, but they’ll probably just blame Democrats because Fox News tells them to.