For those interested:

Pangolin

deleted by creator

You can’t, if the code is open source it can be cloned to not fit in the license no matter what kind of license or fancy shenanigans you do.

The argument most MIT/BSL proponents have is that companies will be more likely to directly contribute if the project doesn’t have GPL “poisoning”.

I usually split the difference and license LGPL for everything.

This “poisoning”, effect is the reason the LGPL and AGPL licenses exist.

Even if you assume human nature is greed, it’s also human nature to have their babies eaten by wolves but I don’t see anyone suggesting we should center our society on baby tossin’ wolf pits.

It’s creating a snowball effect in Japan, as schools, daycares and kindergartens close down it’s getting harder and harder to find people to watch kids when people need to work. Most daycares have waiting list and point systems determining how much “need” a set of parents have for daycare because there’s not enough of them.

Research from a few years ago was able to measure gait (so a person’s height and build etc) from the wifi shadow of a single router.

I assume 3 is to get the super accurate placement.

Real life Ralph Wiggum “and I saw one of the babies and the baby looked at me” comment

They’re both “immutable” in the sense that they’re setting up either read-only Filesystem Hierarchies (as in bazzite, which uses ostree) or Symlinking their entire filesystem hierarchy to a read-only “store” (as in nixos).

Bazzite uses something called ostree to “diff” the filesystem hierarchy much like git does, while Nix basically makes giant read-only store of files and hashes them, then weaves them all together into a “view” of a filesystem that gets symlinked into the context of a running program.

A real flatpak cake would come wrapped in the oven used to bake it.

I mean, they could make the sponsorship of the visa cost money instead…

It’s not just that, it’s also the fact they scored the responses based on user feedback, and users tend to give better feedback for more confident, even if wrong, responses.

I know of matrix, what are some other alternatives?

Also a protocol that got falsely maligned during the crypto days was secure scuttlebutt, and people should be talking about it more.

NSAIDs cause crazy increased risk of intestinal bleeding and and it inhibits the ability for the kidneys to excrete uric acid, they also increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

My point is that comparatively, acetaminophen is (or at least was) the safest drug for light pain.

I haven’t seen any new categories of painkiller that would indicate that’s no longer the case, though.

I’m confused where this zeitgeist about Tylenol being bad for you is coming from. I remember working in pharmacy that taking Acetaminophen was the least reactive painkiller with the least number of long-term issues, but I’m hearing a lot more people talking about how bad it is for you.

The studies I’ve seen have been correlative at best, and, considering that NSAIDs and opioid painkillers are far worse over time, I don’t understand the dissonance in advice that seems to be appearing.

Is this more “seed oil” nonsense?

Their predicted 2025 revenue is supposedly 5 billion so this is a decent chunk.

Not enough, but a decent chunk.

I know we want to get really riled up and say that he’s committed a war crime but presidents have been extra judicially killing drug dealers since Obama put them on the Disposition matrix (the “kill list”).

Trump even goes out of his way to call them “narcoterrorists” because the way the law was written when the “war on terror” started (not that he pays that much attention to the law), anyone that has a mild supporting role in Al Qaeda and it’s diaspora have open season on them without Congressional oversight in perpetuity.

I want people to understand that this is wrong but also every president has been doing this since 2010

A preponderance of post-ambulation pontificators, if you will.

I imagine it’s a continuation of the isolation that social media causes.

edit: looked into this a little more and found This medium article. saying there wasn’t much change in the rate of sex weekly for adults in the 90s, and not until the early 2000s when OECD countries started seeing a reduction.

Not sure what to trust but Family Studies is a conservative think-tank so I don’t necessarily trust their data either.