That is the weird thing with ecology. You would expect the “how do we fight” to be the political battle, but it’s just “should we accept reality ?”.

Never understood why we call them tech companies to be honest. There is nothing technologically interesting at twitter. And if there is… it is never the subject.

Ahah ! So you just change the definition of a word to make it fit your worldview. And yes wikipedia is not a great source but it usually cover the basic stuff. I gave you the link to get you started but I see you’re not interested in educating yourself about the subject.

I mean, again, you think capitalism mean limited state intervention. It does not. By definition.

I’ll let you in you own world with your own words and custom definitions !

Well… no. It never was. Even the USA is highly intrusive and protectionnist. Also, state capitalism ? In you other responses you talk about China like it’s not a capitalist country. China is the main example of state capitalism.

I think you are confusing capitalism with something else.

The wikipedia article is a good start if you are interested.

A socialist or communist society could be healthier. Not saying it automatically would be. The only people theorizing a sustainable economy are on the (far) left though.

And the last 50 years proved that sustainability is impossible in a capitalist system. It hinders profits, and the basis of capitalism is: always more profits.

Capitalism means always looking for more profits. Endless efforts of private owners to expand and increase their profits leads to the perpetual circle of suproduction and overconsumption which destroy ressources and ecosystems.

This particular system is the main reason it’s happening.

If we take into consideration the destruction of the ecosystems necessary to sustain human life, capitalism is a net-negative.

It’s useful as tracking data