Dang I didn’t realize root beer has so many rules.

How do you the plugs eliminate fire risk?

I think we can rule out moon cheese.

Actually I just think genocide is bad and thats really the whole thought process, it’s not very nuanced.

This is a paid ad

Keep spam off of Lemmy.

Fuck the church and everything it stands for, but you need to stop whiffing your own farts and calling it roses.

I haven’t bought one yet so I’m probably not the right person to ask. Everyone I know with a Hyundai seems happy, though.

Yea those are all shit cars as well. I don’t think many would disagree. It turns out several different cars are shitty.

If the vehicle was sold broken and has to be fixed, it’s a recall.

How’s the glue on your pizza working out?

How much could I get paid if I made a spam bot like this?

….thats the way I like to…stretch.

Yep, PG&E charges me a connection fee, a maintenance fee, and delivery fee. However the dynamic rates for electricity never go below $0.40 (and go up to $.70 with more price hikes in the works) even at the cheapest times when the state electricity market is at negative rates. Funny how that works.

The state of California has a great live and historical dashboard of power production and consumption that you can click around in to get an intuitive sense of where the problems arise. We have more batteries than anywhere else in the world but it’s still nowhere near enough. CAISO daily outlook

Edit: the supply dashboard is more useful for this discussion: CAISO supply

Based and red-pilled. (Don’t yell at me back in my day the red pill entered the matrix, instead of just meaning racism.)

Seriously if it was free for me to run a hot tub I would be a more relaxed person…but somehow these negative power prices never seem to trickle down to the consumer 🤔.

You’re way better at this than the clowns in the MIT press department and you only tried for a few seconds. Which means the people who wrote the headline are either so stupid they can’t tie their own shoes, or they have a malicious agenda. I lean towards the latter.

The media arm of MIT has been steaming garbage for years and constantly misrepresents the studies from their own researchers for clickbait.

But that aside, even though the engineering work out of MIT is solid, their economic opinions heavily reflect the fact that it’s an institution full of trust fund nepotism.

The point here is that Israel is invading, but the Times was too compromised to call it an invasion. Usually when someone says “sends troops” to another country it’s to help after an earthquake or flood or fire or something. When someone invades with troops it’s called an invasion. The Times has a long history of unreasonably downplaying the violent actions of the Israeli government specifically, while using plain straightforward language in other conflicts, which demonstrates bias.