Thats not completly right at least under german law (and most likely also under us law).

A license is basically a contract between you and the copyright owner. If the copyright owner changes the distribution of a piece of software to a new license you have a diffrent contract with them. So you have to hold up this new license. If you already had a license (in this case gpl) you can use this old contract, but you can not download a new copy delete what was added since the copyright change and use that under gpl. You would have to proof that you had the gpl license before or in this case that it got relicensed to you.

So the original code wasnt gpl at all then. If this was true i would be pretty sure this repo would already be closed.

No, this is plainly wrong. A license is a proclamation of the copyrightowner how others can use their material. The copywrite owner does not license their own work to themself, they can do whatever they want with their copyright. If you are not the copyright owner you have to have the license and afe only permitted to use the material after that license.

Well yes and no you can release them going forward under a new licence. If you obtained your copy under the old license you can use it under the old license when you obtain a new copy you have a new license agreement. Thats absolutly possible to do.

Revoking licenses is alot harder though and changing the lizens from a foss on to another is often confusing and business inapropiate. However it is legal.

Edit: A license is for not vopyright owners not the copyright holder. The copyright holder can basically do whatever they want.

Well yes and no you can release them going forward under a new licence. If you obtained your copy under the old license you can use it under the old license when you obtain a new copy you have a new license agreement. Thats absolutly possible to do. Revoking licenses is alot harder though and changing the lizens from a foss on to another is often confusing and business inapropiate. However it is legal.

If you are the copyright owner you can relicense any way you want learn some copyright law.

Very broken gears

Well i mean no but kinda yes. iOS 18.1 has part pairing, which means it only works on specific hardware configurations

Well it is potentially faster, more uniform and harder. But the biggest difference is your brain does not know that you are controlling them. Same with tickeling basically

It looks like a hismith and from my and my wifes personal experience: yes it is worth it. However this only helps if you like/can come from penetration. There are many different attachments for it so you can use basically any dildo even fantasy stuff, which on first sight seem impossible.

While i am sleeping obviously

Well thats some weird knowledge do you have a source maybe?

Tja XD

Quicksilver? English Quecksilber is german Both come afaik from the greek/latin word for it (Hydrargyros/hydrargyrum)

Tbh i just like quicksilver more because it is phonetically near the german word for it Quecksilber. I am aware that quicksilver is archaic but i kinda just dont care

Good news everyone! That already exists. https://bimek.com/

No because it is lego it will be 5 completly new enterprises never seen before (because they are shit at moddeling and unable to copy a design)

Ohhh ho, in the middle of

Yes i do, married and with kids

Well most countries handle it this way. You get your visa revoked and thats it. Pretty normal stuff and rarely is a judge involved. In the usa they dont even need to revoke a visa to throw you into guantanamo it seems. Non citizens normally dont have a right to stay in a country. It is a priviledge not a right.

I am not sure how i feel about needing a lot of evidence to rewoke visas.

In this case 3 ppl are eu citizens and the eu “freizügigkeit” needs more evidence than just allegations. However when a few neo nazi hooligans from ireland would storm into a university i would like them to be deported, especially if they dont even say the allegations are wrong. So i have to admit i am indifferent in this case.