thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
bought mine 3 years ago. it’s my favorite summer sport now.
yeah this is what i used for some projects, i.e. rmarkdown which also integrates the statistics part
and then there are fucking PIs insisting on word files who never heard of tracked charges let alone of file naming conventions.
in Germany this is boomer humor when referring to beer: chilled hops’ infusion
where are the flood tunnels installed to guard the treasure?
there is a phrase in scientific publishing where people plagiarize a paper but run it through a thesaurus to change certain words to make it less obvious. thing is, randomly picking things up from a thesaurus leads to what is called tortured phrases.
retraction watch has more
I’m having the same problem. this kind of nested argument is quite annoying to program in e.g. argp. i am even thinking of using a minimal forth like parser to do this.
if it remember it correctly it was said in relation to algorithm optimization > code optimization
awesome! thanks the tip!
die hard.
I’m using vim mode in my bash and i agree that a mode indicator would be nice
German is a bit ambiguous here. we use Fleisch for animal flesh that is eaten as food (meat) but also in the sense of flesh in general.
love a hot fuzz reference https://youtu.be/mcFN-I7_IjA?t=168&feature=shared
a regular on retraction watch (highly recommended): https://retractionwatch.com/?s=gueguen
they need to identify you, not necessarily using your id card.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj#d1e2161-1-1
chapter 3, section 1, artcle 12, paragraphs 1 & 2.
i doubt there is profit to be made. it’s more to keep them busy and learning about gdpr.
they they need to id you everytime you exercise your gdpr rights. there is nothing they can do about this.
no it’s not. but you should know what you’re getting into.
in the beginning of my PhD i really loved what i was doing. from an intellectually point of view i still do. but later, i.e. after 3 years doing a shitty postdoc, i realized that I was not cut out for academia but nevertheless loved doing science.
however, i was lucky to find a place in industry doing what i like.
so i guess my 2c is: think about what comes after the PhD and work towards that goal. a PhD is usually not a goal in itself. hth