Like just in terms of “bullets” ejected?

This sends a clear message: if you still have a valuable handle, sell it now.

“Fighting for” is leaving a lot up for interpretation here.

That better system looks more realistic now that we can have AI and robots do nearly everything. The artificial scarcity is becoming more and more obvious.

If it’s like the old half-cent coins, then pennies will be worth more as collectibles after they’re discontinued.

Capitalism

You have incorrectly guessed which simple concept it is. Look it up.

It’s dumb to draw any sort of line.

Attentive is looking up from time to time for people who are waving, not interrupting.

I think everyone is confused because people don’t normally think of “I” and “my” as gendered in the first place.

The problem is that almost everyone would be better off if the housing market tanked. Except donors.

Yes, I’m saying humans are omnivores and vegetarianism is just a choice.

Well we’ve got to play something, maybe we can switch to Prosperity rules.

It’s designed to illustrate a simple concept from real-life economics.

I try to avoid “gotcha” DMing. It’s frustrating for players to focus on what feels like an unimportant detail. If the players are wrong about what’s unimportant, then give their characters a wisdom save to notice.

I can easily imagine what a stronger person would be able to lift. But I can’t easily imagine what a wiser person would remember to check.

Does anyone actually say that?

That’s how I see it. I’m a vegetarian omnivore, if my life depended on it I would eat meat.

At this point they’re long-standing bugs.