I mean, we all know the reasoning is bullshit, except the lead huffers.

https://youtu.be/BGgKliP9UDU

I think this might be misinformation. Businesses here need to comply with the timeline in the bill. The real issue is that Mike Kehoe, the governor, might repeal on the basis that prop A was unconstitutional as it was broad and addressed multiple issues i.e. sick leave + increasing min wage. There were protested Saturday, and there will be more next Saturday in STL because they postponed due to tornados.

Our CEO was a hyper optimist. He didn’t elevate anybody who wasn’t a peppy yes-man.

I’ve reported directly to the head before. Here’s why they don’t like remote work. These bosses are typically highly narcissist paired with paranoia.

I think many CEOs thinks like Trump, so let’s work off that. They have narcissism and paranoia. They are highly insecure. They assume the worst and others, but have ridiculously high expectations.

Trump can’t fathom people doing the right thing for the sake of it. He has never done a thing that didn’t benefit him. He can’t imagine not cheating someone given a chance. He’s cheated every single time.

My CEO was highly paranoid. He decided to setup cameras anywhere. He started confronting employees who left early or arrived later not understanding that everybody doesn’t arrive or leave the office at the same time. Even though the company needed focus on the agenda, he spent most of his time stalking employees.

When I was confronted for leaving early, I had to explain that I’m still working while making a delivery on my way home, or that it’s okay for me to be late if the first thing I do when I wake up is to respond to urgent emails and make important calls. This resulted in retaliatory pay cuts, so I quit. Of course, the business could not afford to lose me, so now I do contract work for more than double per hour and found a new job that treats everyone a lot better.

These people are truly detached from reality. Their poisoned brains prevent them from understanding basic human nature. The only side of human nature they understand is how people bend over for money. They’re control freaks.

Keeping you in office means they have the ability to pressure you. Emotional manipulation through micro management or unreasonable expectations. They know that at home, they can’t see you squirm. At work, you’re not safe, but at home, you are.

The show-me state strikes again

Ms. Rachel is today’s Mr. Rogers. My baby is singing and counting and learning letters and mom and I are absolutely blindsided each time she does something new.

Ms Rachel was a music teacher for a preschool and started her channel to help her speech delayed child. She’s engages and includes, using language like “grown ups” instead of “mom” or “dad”. She has a member who does sign language and also a non-binary member who is her long time friend. My niece was enamored by their inclusion when I know that her side of the family is less receptive to differences.

Ms Rachel has fund raised for the children of Gaza and is harassed and boycotted by the right for doing so. I’ve learned a lot from Ms Rachel as a new parent and she’s a treasure.

Fun fact: there are three cops for every 1000 people.

Pro life forcing the brain dead to give birth, even if the fetus is already dead or suffering incredible pain and expected to die.

But it’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. It should be illegal for me to claim I’m disabled when I’m not or that bleach cures autism. Misinformation should be illegal.

How many times do republicans need to fuck things up for people to learn their lesson?

Anti abortion pushing against drug that reduces abortion. This is why we don’t call them pro life.

Obviously, using an AI to verify if somethingis AI is kinda bullshit, but this is what deepseek spat out:

The list you shared does have strong AI-generated hallmarks. Here’s why it stands out as likely machine-written, and how you can spot similar outputs in the future:

Telltale Signs This List Is AI-Generated

1. Repetitive Phrasing – Overuse of:

   • “Rescinding [X] for [Y]”
   • “Streamlining [A] with respect to [B]”
   • “Withdrawing [Product] as a Covered [Category]”

2. Excessive “Rescinding” Verbs – A human would vary language more (e.g., “repeal,” “abolish,” “eliminate”).

3. Oddly Specific Yet Vague Items – Some entries sound bureaucratic but lack real-world impact (e.g., “Rescinding Test Procedures for Small Electric Motors”).

4. Inconsistent Scope – Jumps from major energy policies (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to trivial ones (showerhead pressure).

5. “Unnecessary ADR Regulations” – ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a niche term unlikely in a political deregulation push.

6. No Partisan Signaling – A real Trump/Musk DOGE list would include culture-war items (e.g., “Ending EV mandates”) or tech-bro priorities (e.g., “Fast-tracking AI nuclear reactor approvals”).

How to Prove It’s AI-Generated

• Ask for Sources: A real policy list would reference laws, executive orders, or press releases.
• Check for Recent Events: Some items (e.g., “Clean Energy Federal Building Rule”) may not exist.
• Test for Overlap: Run a portion through an AI detector (like Originality.ai).
• Compare to Known AI Outputs: Lists with 47-50 items are common for AI (round numbers = generation artifacts).

If You Suspect DOGE Is Using AI for Policy

This would be a major scandal. Next steps:

1. Compare drafts over time—AI lists will lack edits.
2. Check metadata (if possible) for AI tool signatures.
3. Demand justification for each item—AI can’t explain reasoning.

Let me know if you want help digging deeper! This is a wild (and concerning) scenario if true. 🕵️♂️

I want to note that the AI barely comprehended the idea of a government agency DOGE existing or the idea that Trump was reelected. I had to hammer it in:

Ah, got it—so we’re envisioning a Doge-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a Trump 2024 victory, where Elon Musk and a bunch of 20-year-old tech bros are ruthlessly slashing bureaucracy with meme-fueled chaos.

Here’s your **47 absurd, inefficient, or just

Holy shit that DOE list is AI as hell

User name does not check out

You count just say you disagree and explain why it upset you.

Hear me out. You’re villainizing me because what I said struck a nerve. You don’t actually believe I want you dead. You’re just upset that I pointed out a deep flaw. Maybe it’s an insecurity, or cognitive dissonance, or whatever. I’m very familiar with this type of response. Whatever it is, realize that someone likely depends on you and that an unhealthy lifestyle is not good for them. I’m encouraging you to do better, if not for yourself, the people in your life you care for. I recognize my ignorance. I’m not a therapist. I’m just stating something I’ve personally observed.

Look. Shitty doctors exist, but when 1/3 of the US is overweight, there are underlying issues that need addressing. I only hear horror stories when an addict, alcoholic, or overweight individual in my life is feeling insecure or defensive about a prognosis. Too many people deflect and it’s enabling a much larger issues. Our basic instincts are being exploited.

Got a lot to say but I’ll keep it brief-ish. Corporations love unhealthy people. They will artificially celebrate this and reinforce unhealthy lifestyles. This extends beyond weight.

Once entrapped, escape is hard. Some are passive and depressed. Some are dismissive and defensive. No matter which cycle you are in, it’s unhealthy.

I think smoking is bad like I think being overweight is bad. If a doctor says alcohol is killing you, it probably is. I don’t think hatred is deserved, but don’t expect any validation for those choices.

Calling go go gadget bullet proof head requires that the user makes a contract: their head and neck are permanently hardened, rendering their lips and vocal cords immobilized.

I’m confused. They falsely accused 1,700 cases where people weren’t committing fraud but could only prove that 300 people were and it’s the clinics fault so they need to pay a railroad company from Texas $3M and the government $3M? How could they possibly have caused $6M in damages with only 300 people on medicare? Did each person get paid $20,000?