We change constantly. Not sure what happens tomorrow and the past is something we learn from.

  • 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 28th, 2022

help-circle



  • @AnonomousWolf

    IMHO -> you wouldn’t need to write up such an article if people would think that AI adds an value to their life which is in replacable.

    Example:
    As of now AI is a big toy which you try to justify the use. A google search / fulltext search is much more efficient than using a AI Summary which you should by definition check after anyway.

    You try to justify that we spending more electricity on a technology where we already have working solutions and will need those working solutions in the future too.

    PS: I personally think the fundamental flaw in your article is that you define something can get replaced which is often not the case or you don’t compare it to the current most used solution. Example -> Most books aren’t printed anymore but only digitally published. The books which are printed needs to be printed as reference and to archive it long term or are printed for book lovers. So you can’t say there will be 3000W less because it’s not printed anymore.


  • @michaelmrose @swordgeek I 100% agree that Mozilla is important but it’s also clear that currently their is not enough business to keep Mozilla going. I don’t blame them for trying to make a Business , i blame them for not following their former values. You can make a business and still mostly follow values ( look for example to GOG ).
    And what i don’t like the most is the change from opt in to opt out. Every new feature most users don’t want. You can argue that they know this and make it harder and harder to turn off those new “features” . The last time it was hidden in a sub menu in the settings ( switching off sending data to their ad service ) now it’s hidden in about:config.
    I guess next time you need 3rd party patches and compile the browser yourself to switch a “feature” off.



  • @Fizz @swelter_spark I was raised with IT from basically my 9th birthday. The difference was when i was allowed to use IT it was always in a supervisioned environment till i was 14.

    Imho we should make all responsible persons ( parents / teacher / trainer … ) aware of their responsibility again and help them to fullfill their role.

    In the 80’s and 90’s parents could buy a TV for their kids. If they did so, they totally did understand that it’s their task to make sure how much , in what way and when their kids use the TV.

    The society could support by giving labels or times for certain content but they would never stop the availability of certain content.
    Remember the special corners in stores who lend vhs’s and dvd’s ?

    We need to stop over controlling and for sure we need to stop getting lobbied by groups who want to sell their products (business) or want to change the society for their believes (religions).

    There was a reason why democracies usually doesn’t have both influenced their law making.





  • @arc99 you still don’t understand end 2 end encryption. Yes man in the middle decryption can be done. First for this to happen you need to accept the certificates of the firewall ( which in terms of a home PC you can’t force anyone to do ). Second even if you can decrypt the https packets , you can still put an additional layer on top which only you and the reciever has the keys too.

    To give you an example you can easy write down a base64 encoded binary blob in any text field on a website. If this binary blob has been encrypted before noone will be able to tell what is inside.

    So breaking https is useless if someone really wants to hide informations. So no your deep packet inspection is totally useless. The only thing you know is that someone did put strange stuff in a text on a website.