And here we observe the post-brand-name-stating comment section. They should keep doing what they doLITERALLY ANYTHING THAT LOWERS THE AMOUNT OF ADVERTIZING/BRAND ASSOCIATION SEEN FROM ITS EXPECTED VALUE IS THE GREATEST SHIT EVER
And here we observe the post-brand-name-stating comment section. They should keep doing what they doLITERALLY ANYTHING THAT LOWERS THE AMOUNT OF ADVERTIZING/BRAND ASSOCIATION SEEN FROM ITS EXPECTED VALUE IS THE GREATEST SHIT EVER
“The only problem about being immortal is that you need to drink blood, a set of ethical problems spanning a tetralogy”, so I haven’t really seen/read about the exact idea you’re talking about. Got any media where people actually say your kind of Immortality is bad?
Well, (my vegetarian friend’s least favourite dumb philosophical question:) Is Death Even Actually Painful?
ooor, “people only get rich if they are not good, they do not stop being good as an actual result of having money”. That’s what I thought OP[1] meant.
The “equity” from "Private Equity (has consumed America by Sam “Wendover Productions”)? or which one? If you mean equality (also known as equity): do you mean how insisting on equality of e.g. external conditions (taxes, school curricula, etc.) is ableist or something?
the Biblical Angel/I Forgot Who It Was one was better
And/or it makes you sound like a zoologist
the real reason he didn’t deduct the wish from your total is because that would make him a wish fund manager
The modern school equivalent of cheap pranks on computers isn’t some elaborate virus, it’s just pressing the “mail” or “calculator” keys on the keyboard for the guy next to you. Never personally witnessed anything more elaborate, though my classmate apparently distributed dubious batch files he wrote once
I use .tar.gz in personal backups because it’s built in, and because its the command I could get custom subdirectory exclusion to work on.
I’ve been waiting for a joke like this. In hindsight, it was inevitable.
@carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone just said
about a meme where it is much more obvious, but especially without context I think it could be said again that its mean to the depicted bandit to show im as grumpy and having a disfigured stereotypical bandit chin, except when you know these features have somehow caused him to become a bandit. If they are typical features of a bandit depiction, but not based on the actual appearance of bandits (or whatever the guy even is), then it is sadly a stereotype. I want more people to think these thoughts because I liked them.
what i’ve learned is that I’d much rather live in this echo chamber with windows to the outside than in another echo chamber
Though the only erotic things I’ve ever seen take at least some mental work to classify as porn, this does make me wonder how the taboo on this topic causes people and their experiences to be locked in 1-sized bubbles, because they only ever share these kinds of allusions and assume it’s the same for everyone else.
I need to know: Is that parenthesized bit a big exaggeration, do you mean you didn’t want to anymore, was it very long, or are there actually people for which porn takes on some infohazard-like quality where they can’t stop themselves so much that it’s actually exhausting? It’s not really your shame but all these cryptic allusions everyone here is making make me feel really out of touch.
the small benefits of being gay i guess
can you stop i’m not clicking on that
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
clotheted.