something so sexy needs to be marked as NSFW
you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same
actually that’s written with stone
well yeah, there’s only so much sexy to go around. how else do you propose we save some for spiders?
I’m not sure what source other than the bible you propose to answer a question on Christain doctrine?
sorry, I’m a little slow today. how is this seemingly keeping the economy afloat?
don’t forget ablutophobia
you’re assuming they’re doing it by accident
yeah but by Cantor’s diagonal argument, you still wouldn’t be listing all the real numbers
assuming the interval includes all of the real numbers, then it is definitely larger than aleph null (the size of all countable infinities)
yeah, but where do you think that information comes from? that’s right, research. it’s research papers all the way down.
don’t get carried away by big research /s
every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )
you still need to sell the burger to make your income (franchising aside for now). no matter how monopolistic you are, there is always a demand constraint
I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?
actually history is just our collective understanding of the past, so if it changes, history changes
Right, and this Walmart in Europe would be where exactly?
that’s just a fancy way of saying:
imagine you have two children and live in a system of gavelkind succession. now consider the share of one of the children. then forget the children and make that share the new bank balance
I’m pretty sure he was involved with the liberation theology movements in Argentina before the previous pope clamped down on it (in his capacity as a cardinal)