Removed by mod

Good points

Where has dismantling worked without giving way to exploitation and coercion?

This is very contested land. The people living there before them had just driven out the people living their before them who had also done the same and it goes on like that for a very long time. When you get back to it the best archaeological records say the earliest people there were likely one of the less popular sects of Jews.

If we’re going by who was living there then everyone after the Jews is an occupier that denied today’s Jews the land of their ancestors. But this is a bad argument.

The truth is in the details:

1. Palestine and Israel both became states at the same time. There were both Arabs and Jews living there.
2. Jews had purchased land from Arabs living there before Israel became a state.
3. A lot of the land in the entire region was empty.
4. The Ottomans kept very poor land ownership records. No one knows who exactly owned what.
5. There were several wars started by Palestine against Israel where the Palestinians lost land.
6. The Gaza strip and West Bank are undeniably Palestinian land. Israel needs to stop attacking the West Bank and taking its land.
7. Gaza, Iran, and all the nationalist organizations and governments that believe in the genocide of Jews as the end goal here need to be removed by their people.

Yeah dude you’ve just solved the question of where to send 8m people of various means who are so widely discriminated against that they formed a state to defend their remaining people.

The answer of where to send them both is nowhere. It’s to cease fire and everyone accepts a two state solution.

The uncomfortable question no one wants to answer.

You can’t just start with an unsupported assertion and derive a logical conclusion from it. Your axioms need to be provably true. Logical reasoning does not work when based on either false or unfalsifiable premises.

The alternative is to do the action of not shopping at Amazon and then over time you’ll learn how to shop without it.

You don’t need to stop 100% immediately either but can wean yourself off of it.

I’ve not shopped on Amazon for like 5 years now. I just buy a lot less crap to be honest.

Keep coping loser. Many of us will be trying to actually fix the mess.

See the rest of the sentence.

No. The Texas legislature meets in January of odd numbered years. They can call special sessions but they can’t make a worse law as it’ll be equally unenforceable and if they did there’d be lawsuits to get injunctions to stop the count until it’s resolved.

There’s likely to be appeals of this ruling though.

Anyways try to be more positive. This is a win.

This is social media, not a court of law. My standard of determination on where my money goes and what content I watch doesn’t need to be beyond a reasonable doubt.

Doesn’t take too high of an IQ to come up with this dog whistle.

Center to center right. Liberals tend to see themselves as left of center though and the word has very little meaning overall. I was mostly just making a joke though.

Some internet leftists are anti-jokes and our greatest insult is to call someone a liberal.

Unless I missed something Elton John testified at trial as a defense witness. Like fuck Spacey but this is a nothingburger. Giving testimony under oath in a trial is a basic part of how our justice system works.

Imagine being internally terrified of the mundane world around you and outwardly certain you’re a big bad wolf. Such is a conservative.

You absolutely always make more power than what is being consumed. You need to have overage.