• 0 Posts
  • 683 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • Here is a nice little inflation chart I’ve assembled:

    You people are upset about (analogy) gas being 5.31 a gallon when you should be upset that you don’t make enough to afford gas at 5.31 a gallon. You should make enough to afford a $450 switch 2, and the fact that you don’t is because your masters have been stealing from you for 30+ years. Or since forever, if you’re as woke as me.

    NES
    1985 $179 -> 2025 $528
    Games $49.99 -> $147

    SNES
    1991 $199 -> 2025 $464
    Games $49.99 -> $116
    Super Mario All-Stars $59.99 -> $140

    N64
    1996 $199 -> 2025 $403
    Games $59.99 -> $121

    GameCube
    2001 $199 -> 2025 $355
    Games $49.99 -> $89

    Gameboy
    1989 $89.99 -> 2025 $230
    Games $29.99 -> $76

    Gameboy Advance
    2001 $99.99 -> 2025 $178
    Games $34.99 -> $62

    Nintendo DS
    2004 $149.99 -> 2025 $251
    Games $29.99 -> $50

    Playstation 1
    1995 $299 -> 2025 $622
    Games $49.99 -> $104

    Playstation 2
    2000 $299 -> 2025 $552
    Games $49.99 -> $92

    X-Box
    2001 $299 -> 2025 $535
    Games $49.99 -> $89

    Sega Genesis
    1989 $189 -> 2025 $483
    Games $59.99 -> $153

    Sega Dreamcast
    1999 $199 -> 2025 $380
    Games $49.99 -> $95






  • Criticizing the term’s over use

    You can’t police overuse. Just disagree and move on.

    By constantly handwringing about it every single time it comes up, you end up teaching people that that’s the way you are supposed to react to this information. It becomes a thought terminating cliche. Somebody says nazi, and the first thing anyone else thinks about is “well, they’re probably just being hyperbolic.” You’re reinforcing the same narrative.

    Like, a good nazi accusation usually comes with an argument. “Such and such is a nazi because of these 6 things I saw them do, and they kicked a dog also,” but even then, people will twist themselves into pretzels about whether the word is still “too much” or not. You have to cut them off. It’s not relevant. It doesn’t need to be given dignity as a criticism. It only serves as a distraction from the 6 points.

    People do the exact same thing about the word genocide.

    Think about it this way: an actual nazi benefits from these terms being muddy and unworkable, so our strategy cannot depend on clear waters; we will never get them.


  • we should be more precise with our language

    I swear this exact phrase is an FBI plot to get people to doubt everything they see and hear.

    “That school shooter was a nazi” “Well, we ought to be careful when saying things like that.”
    “Elon Musk is a nazi.” “And what has he done exactly? You know, it’s important to be precise. The story of the boy who cried wolf is that …”
    “Hitler was a nazi.” “Well, he was in charge of the nazis. Specificity is really important when handling delicate matters like these, you know.”

    Not to pick on you specifically, but I am so fucking tired of hearing it.








  • Can you be more specific in why do you think that a stem major would need to also study humanities?

    The fact that you would even ask this. Do you even know what they study in there? Speaking of rejecting knowledge, my guy, there is so much out there to learn. You have trapped yourself within the smallest box.

    is better than “art is something that is made by someone who a subculture of the western world […]”

    Mine is actually “art is communication,” but if being dishonest makes you feel better, go for it, buddy.


  • How would you able to take the script written by the monkey and thrown it into the trash

    Why would I throw a marvelous statistical anomaly into the garbage?

    Something being art or not cannot depend on the knowledge on who or what did it.

    It can. It does. “Welcome to the neighborhood!” from your neighbor and from a local Internet Service Provider inherently mean different things, even if they’re “identical.”

    you may have issues when you see a piece of art without the ability to know it’s contexts.

    For most of human history, I’ve been able to assume that something that looks like it was built by people was built by people.

    The existence of LLMs has made me more cautious, yeah. Seems like a societal net-negative.

    If we want an objective truth

    God, this is why stem majors need to take humanities.