They?
They?
Yeah. Flying squids answer was better.
From the article:
Also, in 2022, several unidentified developers sued OpenAI and GitHub based on claims that the organizations used publicly posted programming code to train generative models in violation of software licensing terms
They can argue about it not being a copy all they want. If there is a single GPL licenced line of code scraped then anything they produce is a derivative work & must be licenced GPL.
nice.
I asked chatgpt & it said this: " The internet can feel overwhelming or negative at times due to various factors like misinformation, toxicity in online communities, and the sheer volume of content. It’s important to curate your online experience by choosing reliable sources and engaging in positive communities that align with your interests and values. Taking breaks from the internet or limiting exposure to certain types of content can also help maintain a healthier online experience. Don’t share sensitive info. Chats may be reviewed and used to train our models. Learn more ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. " I think that a better answer might have something to do with commercial interests.
Usenet:
Edit: I’m talking about step 3
True - that’s a big reason I like open source software. Doesn’t help with search though.
We probably should specify that this image is in degrees reaumur (°R)
Bold strategy, lets see how…
…oh. oh no.
I didn’t expect to get this far - I’ve got nothing.
Canadian
I lIkE tHe SpOnGeBoB sArCaStIc CaPs.
CamelCaps has met it’s match.
I heard he electrocuted an elephant.
1: yes
2: Normally derivative works are patched or modified versions of the original. I think the common English meaning would apply & chatGPT et al are fucked. I doubt there is a precedent for this yet.