It’s like no one ever showed this man how to dive to save a shot. The second free kick last night was comical.and a far bigger error but the first one I’ve no idea what he was trying to do. How do you get faked out other side from a free kick, even though the balls still within a yard of you when it flies past.
What you bitching for then
Okocha
To paraphrase Newcastle fans after the Arsenal game a few weeks ago…
“You win some you lose some. One things for sure, you won’t hear Newcastle fans complaining like the Arsenal fans are now, when a decision goes against them. Just part of the game”
Carragher bringing the game into disrepute by criticising the officials smh
Always was surely. Or at least, was previously.New thing becomes the old thing, becomes the new thing etc. We’re one step away from the glorious 4 4 facking 2 being back in vogue again.
You’re absolutely shite. Pipe down.
I’d just get rid of penalties for anything other than clear denial of a goal scoring opportunity, where the offence prevents the direct opponent shooting.
Why are we giving free shots on goal for a dubious handball that takes place in the far corner of the box when we’ve no idea if it will result in a chance to score.
As others have said, the risk/reward for forcing a penalty is heavily gamed towards the attacker, and just invites all manner of diving and conceited attempts to ‘win’ a penalty. Case in point, the Kane dive vs Malta (?) which he was correctly carded for diving for as an example.
Give them direct free kicks 30 yards from goal, or an indirect fk in the box, for everything else
“That’s just who we are, mate”
What are we protesting? This is what we want.
Expecting massive protests when? City don’t get their come uppance.
Rodri just strolling everywhere
Vicario.
Literally never heard of him, which maybe speaks more to my ignorance.
I was yukking it up at Arsenal signing Spurs’ first choice as a rotation player, and then homie turned out to be unreal.
Fair play.
That’s ridiculous. The losses are taken over a 3 year period for a start
No
This is such nonsense. You can cite the problems with Arsenals sleeve sponsor, though I’d bet the poster would struggle to actually articulate what they are. But equating a sponsorship from a country’s tourist board for a football team to the UKs illegal and heartless policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is pathetic.
Really, what Arsenal and all clubs should worry about from this ruling is trying to find a way to annex themselves from the UK if you find this problematic.
Oh shocker, posted by a Newcastle flair. We’ve been in your head rent free for so long now that we must qualify for squatters rights. You got the 3 points. Cheer up
So we’re not in any doubt. Arsenal may be sponsored by an airline from UAE. They may have a sponsorship with the Rwanda tourist board. Newcastle are owned by a regime, that in September, executed the 100th person this year as capital punishment. When all you Geordies were celebrating a return to the CL at the end of last season, loving your owners, the same regime was executing 7 18 year olds for ‘crimes’ committed when they were children. One was 12 when they committed the egregious crime of protesting the regime.
And here Newcastle fans are, point scoring over shirt sponsorships. Cant even be as brave as a 12 year old. Pathetic and shameless.
I dont disagree specifically with what he’s saying. He has a point, but the SL isn’t the answer, even with the PL being a de facto SL.
All that being said, I dont remember La Liga complaining circa 2008 to ≈ 2016 when a Ronaldo/Messi lead La Liga was kicking the shit out of everyone else and taking everyone else’s best players.
Arsenal lost so many players to Barcelona that they may as well have relocated the runway for London to Barcelona flights to N7.
Need to make one first