stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 3rd, 2025

help-circle
  • Just speaking one hexbear to another: switching away from the operating system and ecosystem favored by the security industry and privacy conscious elite which has a well documented history of being the hardest target for law enforcement, requiring the highest bar for legal cooperation and providing methods of protecting personal data (even if that behavior isn’t the default) and yet keeping yourself on the voter rolls is something to chew on.

    I been mulling over your reply and I can’t put into words what I feel but it’s similar to when a friend in recovery with a ton of trauma and long ass rap sheet was excited to get out there at the demonstration.

    I can’t say what’s best for you but it makes me worry.

    I’m about halfway through extreme privacy and I’m legit about to order a personal copy just so I can scribble in the margins. I’ll read your link too probably tomorrow after work.



  • So, that has nothing to do with apple or macs. (Except a part at the end which might not be what you’re talking about)

    When you use a credit card the transaction record is kept by the merchant who sells you the computer, the card processor and the card issuer (I’m probably using the wrong terms, it’s been awhile since I had to accurately talk about the precise operation of credit card payments.). So when you buy anything using a credit card, at least three entities who can be ordered to submit to law enforcement requests and are legally required to keep records of transactions actually have records of that transaction.

    So when I swipe my visa to get a bag of apples at the wal mart, wal mart, their processor and my bank all have record that they’re required to keep for accounting purposes and will turn over when they get a lawful order to do so.

    I don’t remember if it’s the law now, back when I was really in pos there were lots of bills trying to make it law, but it’s certainly industry practice to record serial numbers of high dollar items. The goal is to have a more precise and quick return/service process. You bought unit abcdef123456 and that means if they don’t get abcdef123456 back when you try to return it then there’s a problem.

    So when I buy an ideapad at Walmart with cash they record the serial at time of sale and when I try to return a different one with my receipt there’s a serial number line that can be compared and verified.

    That transaction is only stored by wal mart, but can be corroborated by my banks records where I withdrew enough money to buy a computer all at once in person because it’s more than they let me pull from an atm at one time.

    I’ll go even farther:

    Know your customer laws require that merchants verify and in some cases record ids of people making some purchases. So when I go to the wal mart to buy a cheap phone and a prepaid SIM card to stuff in my glovebox, they’re required to record my id for both purchases.

    Now one thing that is true of apple computers and phones and that you might be referring to is that it’s super fucking difficult to remove a device from someone’s appleid without that person doing it for you. When you first use a mac or iPhone you have the chance to tie it to an iCloud account, just like you can with google accounts in android devices and Microsoft accounts on windows computers. If you do, then in order for someone else to reset the device and wipe/reinstall/take ownership of it you have to remove it from your account. Theres a wizard that guides you through the process just like in windows and android. If you never do this then the person who bought the device (or stole it, or dug it out of the trash) can’t use it.

    If you lose your password then apple can verify your identity using their records (if you have their adp turned on then you just have to give em your code and make a new one when you’re done doing whatever you’re doing) and reset the password and remove devices from your account. Certified resellers/repair shops can do this too, but they’re under a lot of scrutiny when they do because Apple views them as possible cracks in the anti-theft armor.

    So that means that when I dig a mac out of the trash to fix and use or sell, I have to either contact the iCloud account holder and convince them to drop the device from their profile or perform some decently tough microsoldering and reprogramming of tiny chips on the mainboard.

    Of course, all that is optional. People just almost never choose not to do it because it is all upside and no downside for the owner. You as the computer owner get theft prevention, stolen device tracking and control over who can use things you bought in exchange for essentially nothing (especially if you turn on adp).

    I haven’t read extreme privacy. I will as soon as I can, but I gotta ask: what are you trying to accomplish or understand? Sometimes for people who aren’t technical it’s easier to start from goals as opposed to metabolizing a bunch of literature on the topic.


  • No, if what you described were true it would be impossible to give someone an apple computer without getting confused for the person you gave it to.

    Or to refurbish and use a mac from the trash can without being mistaken for the previous user.

    I have done both with no problems.

    Apple does know what you bought from them… because they sold it to you and gave you a receipt and kept a record of it to accurately account for taxes just like wal mart does when I buy a bag of apples from the produce department.

    Wal mart doesn’t serialize their apples, but they do serialize their game consoles and keep track of those, so maybe that’s a better example.

    I guess I gotta ask: what do you think is happening between the credit card and the serial number of the computer and how do you think it’s happening?


  • Again, it truly depends on who you want to avoid sticking out to.

    If you don’t know that or don’t feel comfortable articulating it then I can’t help you.

    I can’t just give a detailed explanation about what you might decide with regard to even some of the broad categories of entities that might hold, access, search or compile data about you and leave it up to you to figure out which person concerned about which entity in which circumstances you are because there’s a lot of circumstances around that and it would be unreasonable to write all that out and it would still be too general to be useful.


  • It depends on your goal.

    If you want to prevent cops from using information about you in data brokers’ dbs, yes it’s worth your time.

    If you want to keep from getting scammed or duped or have accounts open in your name then yes.

    If you just feel worried then probably not, just freeze your credit with the reporting agencies and schedule a temporary unfreeze when you want to apply for something.

    No matter what you decide, rotate the passwords to each account you’re worried about to a new unique one.


  • I’m not sneezing at it. It’s more than my use in a month, but I’m not trying to maximize my bandwidth use with 100gb of space.

    Just as a thought experiment let’s assume you’re able to use the maximum amount of total bandwidth in a month with your 100gb storage. That’s 40 complete write cycles a month on your ssd.

    Now there’s nuance to the idea of minimizing write cycles, the specific technology plays a big role and ssds that stay constantly powered on can avoid the worst degradation for a long time but:

    That’s 480 write cycles a year.

    No problem if you’re keeping the ssd always powered on, but you may end up with data loss if it’s in a laptop that gets turned off for a little bit.

    That’s why I said a hard drive may be cheaper than Usenet or debrid over the course of a year. Because it’s a solution that kills a lot of birds with one stone.





  • Lots of games do lag compensation. What you’re trying to do is get under their lag compensation wire, where they’ll do what’s possible to keep everything fair for everyone and you.

    Someone already said to shoot for Singapore remote servers. That’s a good start. Make sure you have qsv or your computers equivalent of it to decode video quickly. The decoding time adds to your input lag because you can’t see the stream until it gets decoded for you.

    Someone already said to look into the Chinese bizarro mobo/cpu combos built off of excess chips, prototypes and factory seconds. Bear in mind that support for these is nonexistent unless you read Chinese and sparse at best there. Bear in mind that a lot of the time the CPUs are soldered to the board so you can’t upgrade and have to be a little more careful when installing a heatsink. If you’ve been in the game long enough to pull a bare motherboard out of a dumpster and fiddle around with it until it works then the aliexpress computer pipeline might be a good one for you.

    Check out the Chinese video cards too.

    I have an alternative set of solutions though, and they’ve worked well so far:

    Turn down the resolution. It makes a huge difference. Turn down the texture quality and post processing.

    Alternately, stop playing new games. They’re so bad.

    If you don’t want to turn down the music or stop listening to it, give the intel b series a look. They’re competent at 1440 and cost a fraction of what nvidia cards cost.



  • I would avoid both targeted political advertising and foreign government interference altogether.

    With targeted advertising you run the risk of being seen as or provoking “their invasive advertising scheme versus our scrappy outreach program”. It’s better if even people you disagree with politically have more privacy, so take steps to not align yourself against them and avoid that perception.

    It’s also more of a description of something that can happen as opposed to a way to protect yourself. Knowing that, for example in America, voter rolls including address are provided to hundreds if not thousands of political organizations isn’t gonna help you make better choices unless that choice is not to vote.

    Which is completely valid but aligns you against a bunch of ingrained ideas people have and makes it harder for them to take your positions seriously.

    Foreign government interference is another one to avoid because you’re literally only gonna drive people away when you talk about it. What steps does a person even take to avoid foreign government interference? To the extent that a person can they’re the same steps people should take to avoid law enforcement infiltration. Just use that.

    I’d also argue that individuals can’t really avoid foreign government interference at all or take any individual steps to prevent it, but that’s neither here nor there. Getting people ready to take action is the full extent that it’s useful to your stated goal and like I said, everyone already knows they’re being surveilled.

    But even if all that weren’t true you’re just setting yourself up for another “our allies reasonably making their needs known/benevolent motherland looking out for her diaspora/unjustly targeted minority taking part in protected speech versus their repressive government trying to thumb the scale”.

    Now heres the part that you knew was coming from just my username: the politics of data privacy and open source software are the politics of anarchism and communism, not the politics of capitalism. If you want to chart a political line to serve as a guiding ethos for your project, you want to be looking those directions.


  • I’m not suggesting you treat the word normie as a slur against some group, but that it betrays a type of thought process that will ultimately work against you. If you want to understand why, compare it to my generation’s equivalent: sheeple. The word is intended to express how people are concerned with what everyone else is doing, not on the consolidation of power after the fall of the Berlin Wall or the reliance of Nordic social democracies on the immiseration of the global south or the removal of tassels from flags or the reemergence of lemuria. The language creates an out group and invites the reader (or listener) to join the in group. It’s not useful for understanding what people outside your circle think about data or privacy because it assumes what they think broadly and its context provides the specifics of what they think.

    That’s all just to clarify that it’s not a no-no word, but a word that asserts a premise that probably needs to be examined and rejected if you want to have success in your stated aim.

    As far as shifting the message, I’d actually avoid talking about election conspiracy or any other conspiratorial use of data. Most people recognize the surveillance state. You can just talk directly about the way people’s information flows into the hands of data brokers and from there into the state surveillance system. People are already under the impression that they’re being tracked, just give them a way to impede it.

    “You can stop yourself from being tracked, here’s how:” is gonna be a lot more effective than trying to convince people that they’re being tracked for the purposes of election manipulation.

    You have a section about that but it’s way too far down and you need to lead with it. Of course that also means putting together straightforward steps for accomplishing that task that cover all current versions of android (yes including the bobo vendor specific versions), windows, macos and ios.

    I feel the need to be clear that I wasn’t trying to be rude when describing the overall vibe as student. There’s nothing wrong with being a student and I don’t think it indicates immaturity at all. A few specific elements that contribute to me calling it that are the white on black text, anti corporate imagery with overtones of incitement and use of hot colors like red instead of cool colors like blue.

    Those things make me think student because they’re the elements of a flyer or band tee instead of an informational pamphlet. The reason that comes across as student is that together they say “I’m freaked out/excited and you should be too!” Which is not something that helps your stated goal of helping everyday people become more aware of the importance of data privacy.

    I chose the word student to describe it because i had hoped it would convey all that and some measure of how “crank” a lot of that messaging strategy comes across.

    You don’t want to be ranting in the street, handing out flyers or selling newspapers if you’re worried about actually reaching people.

    I’d avoid gamifying privacy. It’s kind of a masters tools situation.


  • My first recommendation would be don’t call people normies. Not using a pejorative to refer to your subject even in private goes a long way towards being able to think about them more clearly. I’m not scolding you, I don’t care how you think about people but if you really want to get people to care about privacy the same way you do then it’s important to avoid stigmatizing them straight out of the gate so you can understand what is important to them.

    I’d abandon the adbusters model of “here’s how you can stick it to the man and all you’ve got to do is change your entire life!” It reads as performative and relies on the false assumption that disorganized, individual opposition can lead to change. Instead, revise your message to focus on first recognizing the hostility of the information space around us and taking an appropriate posture.

    I would also abandon any mention of self hosting. If you’re trying to get people to clear their cache and turn on adp and lockdown mode throwing self hosting in the mix is absurd. Oh yeah, and as a long time user and contributor to open source software, treating it as a privacy and security panacea raises a lot of red flags.

    From the perspective of an old man with a lot of experience, the website has high school/college student energy. That’s not bad per se, but it may be working against your stated goals.


  • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.nettoPrivacy@lemmy.mlOpen Home Foundation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I could see your point if we completely ignore the circumstances surrounding the technology. The best metaphor I can think of is star trek. It has to be envisioned as a post scarcity environment for the technology that’s portrayed to be positive and not some new kind of repression or extraction.

    If we lived in a world where the labor saving technologies that comprise smarthomes weren’t used to justify getting worked to the bone even more than you already are or to make it acceptable for energy prices to do anything but rise or to continue to allow climate inappropriate bottom of the barrel housing to be built in places like phoenix then I’d have a different view.

    I see smarthome technology as a relatively simple tool, but my understanding doesn’t stop at the recognition that “it’s a hammer”, it extends out to “who is swinging it?” and “why do my fingers hurt so much?”.

    It’s just really easy to make that criticism of smarthomes because all their benefits are easily, cheaply and efficiently replicated:

    Put your standby stuff on power strips and turn the little red switch off when you’re not using them. Alternately, don’t do this because they’re designed to be left on standby, the power drain is negligible (even if you completely dismiss my reply and block me, buy a kill-a-watt type meter so you can know for sure) and stuff like the ps4 can get fucked up if you turn it off without telling it you’re about to.

    Make checking your doors part of your nightly routine. It doesn’t matter a bit if all the doors are locked if one of them is not quite shut or the electronic lock fails for some reason. Before you say you’ve never seen that happen, I have seen it happen hundreds of times in my workplace.

    I’m willing to concede that minmaxing the hvac is something smarthome technology is good at, but it can be implemented by itself, apart from the smarthome ecosystem and can be replicated by opening and closing windows, putting on or taking off a coat or just - and I know I’ve ambiguously alluded to this already - not having a climate inappropriate home to start with.

    You can get the same effect of dimming lights by switching from bright overheads to dim lamps instead. It’s really cozy.

    A few summers ago our local power company sent around mailers asking us to “beat the peak”. We put the washing machine on one of those old electromechanical timers and set to go off in a few hours and turned it on. The dryer was harder, because it requires a button press but we just put up a clothesline in the yard instead of messing with some simple way to automate it. You don’t wanna be running that thing while no one’s around anyway.

    All simple, sub 5 minute tasks that give a better understanding and arguably a better routine to the household and require little to no computing or automation. Except for not putting stickbuilt houses in places that they don’t make sense. I can’t help you there.

    To reiterate: the technology itself isn’t the problem, it’s the world it’s a component of that makes me dislike it. In a just and sustainable world smarthome shit would be good.



  • Nah, I don’t think smarthomes are a technology that is good in the slightest.

    The only benefits I’m aware of are automated operation of appliances and more efficient climate control. Both are basically ways to negatively impact people’s lives by increasing the amount of suffering that’s acceptable in daily life and make modular, unsustainable, climate vulnerable housing economically viable respectively.

    I’m open to learning if there’s more, it’s just a repulsive, regressive, screw-turning concept on the face of it.