Oh hell no.

Presumably the watermark is just going to be intractably encoded into the video file that’s shipped to the theater. Doing it any other way wouldn’t make sense.

It’s basically impossible to detect well-designed steganography (invisible watermark) unless you have access to the algorithm that writes or reads it, or multiple comparable copies of the media.

This is vibecoded trash and asking $70 for it is honestly offensive.

The proof is that they even vibecoded their Flathub submission PR: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/8077

Space elevators require a counterweight on the other end, but there are various (theoretical for us, for now) launch systems that could be used. Spin launch and a launch loop for example. There’s also orbital rings which are somewhat similar to space elevators but AFAIK don’t require materials as strong as a space elevator would.

The best part about it is that it’s an extremely gradual slope completely unlike the mountain ranges on Earth, so you could haul stuff up there on trucks or trains easily.

They were well funded back when their real goal was to develop ICBMs capable of delivering nukes.

I think Mars, assuming you terraform it, would be pretty close to that on both counts. Space planes might still be difficult, but the delta V is much lower and Olympus Mons would pretty much sit above the atmosphere.

Apparently with 50% higher gravity it would be pretty much impossible with chemical rockets, but with the median of the estimate (so about 12.43 m/s²) it would be possible, you’d just need an incredibly large rocket, or non-chemical propulsion (e.g. nuclear).

A space program on that planet would definitely advance much slower than on Earth.

That’s, uh, not really how that works. A taller atmosphere would mean you have to go through more of it, but unless it’s not a terrestrial then the atmosphere won’t be that much taller.

If it is a non-terrestrial planet, it’s unlikely anyone would be building rockets on there to begin with.

This comic is like 10 years old, but even then it’s amazing because you would think it was made in 2004.

According to Wikipedia this planet has an estimated surface gravity of 12.43 m/s^2 with a margin of error of about 2 m/s^2. That’s only up to 50% higher than Earth’s 9.8 m/s^2 (on the high end of the error margin) so it probably would be possible to get into orbit.

That said we don’t actually know much about it for sure. We don’t know if it’s a terrestrial planet for example. It could be composed mostly of gases and liquids like Neptune.

Orban’s strategy was stealing EU money for himself and his cronies. The EU largely stopped funding Hungary, so the money dried up and he has no reason to cling to power that hard.

Good point.

Maybe, but I don’t know if that’s a good thing. Social intelligence is how CEOs and other charlatans get disproportionate success in society, and if all we had was social intelligence humanity would be nothing but smooth-talking cavemen.

I think those thorough tests are (as you also suggested) mainly used as a diagnosis aid for conditions like ADHD which can manifest as discrepancies between the component scores. In neurotypical people the component scores are AFAIK generally strongly correlated (that is to say, basically the same).

Just curious, what’s the most important one?

“Look, America is founded on free enterprise and capitalism,” said Bill Essayli, the first assistant United States attorney for the central district of California, during the press conference. “Anyone who attacks our values, our way of life, our system, which provides the best goods and services to the most people, we’re gonna come after aggressively.”

What a thing to say.

You’re using AI to turn research papers you don’t understand into science education videos you also don’t understand? What fresh kind of hell.

I actually watched the video and it was surprisingly good, but you might want to tell the AI to give more consideration to the broader context of the field next time, because studies don’t exist in a vacuum. For all we know this paper could be the logical next step in the field (which would lend it credibility) or it could go firmly against well established theory (which would make it an extraordinary claim that needs extraordinary proof).

Anyway hope this helps kinda just info dumped while laying in bed so might forgot something. feel free to ask questions.

Damn you wrote all that on a phone?