The share option within Claude tells a user that “anyone with the link” may view the contents of that link, but does not explicitly state that the link may end up in Google and search results.

It seems like people clicked the “make chat public” button and then shared the link with someone who eventually posted it on a page that got crawled?

Maybe there’s two mistakes here: 1: the user made the chat public and 2: Maybe Anthropic didn’t have their robots.txt file set correctly?

I mean, it seems like the big mistake here is from the users… they clicked the “make this chat public”… unless I’m missing something?

I use Kagi for personal devices. I wish there was an open source alternative, but there’s not. So I’m stuck.

For work or other devices, I use Qwant.

lol. Weird article yeah.

The searches showed Claude chats for which a user had decided to “share” a link had been saved by search engines like Google, leaving them accessible to the broader public.

So… people created public links, shared them to the public, and got surprised they were public?

The share option within Claude tells a user that “anyone with the link” may view the contents of that link, but does not explicitly state that the link may end up in Google and search results.

LOL. Yeah!

Just need 1 subscription to an IPTV service. I’m using BunnyTV, what are other folks using?

Yeah, I would go with Debian for sure.

Although… I’m experimenting with Fedora IoT (the name might be misleading) for my server OS right now…

Third for AirVPN, plus it works with gluetun

😭 <- me when someone uses ad-infested youtube.

• Firefox + uBlock
• Fennec + uBlock
• Grayjay
• Smart tube

That’s probably what the mean… :(

Golden Age of Science (according to Republicans): Flat Earth, Lizard People, Bigfoot, Aliens

LOL! Damn, I’m getting brain rot from work… 😭

Spent some time reading this: https://rosenlaw.com/OSL3.0-explained.htm

Section IV. Source Code And Derivative Works seems interesting.

… authorizes licensees “to translate, adapt, alter, transform, modify, or arrange the Original Work, thereby creating derivative works (” Derivative Works “) based upon the Original Work.” …

Only the Source Code of the Original Work or the Source Code of a modified (altered, etc.) Derivative Work must be disclosed.

If linking (by whatever technical means) can be accomplished by making and using unmodified copies of the Original Work, then 1(a) and 1© permit that; only the Source Code of the Original Work must be disclosed.

I’m totally not qualified to comment on this, but it kiiiinda seems like OSL 3.0 would capture the work2.go file. At least, it doesn’t seem to give up on work2.go as easily as the MPL 2.0…

Maybe a better middle ground between GPL and MIT? It seems like: if you purely use my library, then you don’t disclose anything. But if you touch my library, then you have to disclose the (entire) change?

Seems kinda pointless, no?.. I mean, I get MPL is a weak copyleft license… but sheesh, that weak? If the consumers get to hide 99% of their code, why not just pick MIT? Having the consumers publish a 1 line change seems pretty worthless.

I understand if I want stronger protections, I could move to a GPL license, but is there no middle ground? MPL doesn’t really seem like middle… it seems like just 1 step away from MIT.

LGPL seems interesting, but it doesn’t really seem compatible with languages like Go, where everything is compiled statically.

I guess I’m missing the context the MPL was created for.

I watched the World Cup via IPTorrents TV, which is just BunnyTV. It kinda seems like it may cover a bunch of other sports too?

Exactly.

Boosters: There’s no way to enforce this! This rule shouldn’t exist. You can’t be 100% sure a project isn’t slop. Keep the flood gates open.

Reality: We also can’t 100% enforce that people follow the speed limit, but we have speed limit laws. When we catch someone, we can point to the law. The mere existence of the law also acts as a small deterrent.

Same with Codeberg. We can’t 100% enforce the ban, but when we catch someone we’ll be able to point to the rule and kick em out. And just seeing an “AI not welcome” sign on the wall will deter some amount of people.

Good thing we have pro-AI platforms like GitHub that would never arbitrarily remove projects… Right?? Right???

I saw on the best sellers list had more than like 5g **and those are things meant to be shared **

Are you from the US? Nothing from the best sellers menu is meant to be shared.

Whenever I go to Taco Bell, I usually eat a few different items from the menu. Just 1 soft taco is tiny. I might do a grilled cheese burrito (7g) and 2 doritos locos tacos (2 x 3g), total 13g. Or a mexican pizza (8g) and a chalupa (4g), total 12g. Or if I want to pretend to be healthy, I’ll get a cantina chicken bowl (10g).

Compare that to when I go to McDonald’s, where a quarter pounder with cheese (or Royale With Cheese in France) just has 2g of fiber and that’s definitely one meal (still not meant to be shared). https://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en-us/product/quarter-pounder-with-cheese.html#accordion-c921f9207b-item-842cb18782

Are both of these options terrible for me? Yes. Should I feel bad for eating portions that other countries consider are for two people? Probably! Am I waiting in a drive thru line right now? Absolutely!!

When your body is conditioned to expect whole foods

Uh, sir. This is 'Murica. Our diet consists purely of ground beef disks or ground mystery meat tubes with either red, white, or yellow squirts on top. Accompany that with a big-gulp sized glass of Coca-cola. Or, even better, an ice cold—I’m talking Rocky Mountain ice cold—beer. n now we’re talkin.

… OK. I’ll close the piefed tab… thanks!

a license that better protected your project from corporate theft

See: https://philiplaine.com/posts/getting-forked-by-microsoft/

And no, AI isn’t perfect. But Christ, anybody who points to the problems at AI had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at themselves at the same time.

No one is saying humans are perfect either. But Christ, the scale is clearly not the same. Before, an average bad dev had a limit blast radius. Now they can push a million lines of code and write a convincing description of why this is actually correct with little effort.

later

(Oops. Wait. You’re right to push back. This is totally wrong. This should have never happend.)

Yeah, exactly. Basically the whole thing incentivizes you to NOT use it correctly. Using it incorrectly is the default.