India, the country best known for being notoriously corrupt to the point where it’s very noticeably hindering progress?
India, the country best known for being notoriously corrupt to the point where it’s very noticeably hindering progress?
Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.
Ranked higher than a country where many believe there to only be one valid party and that if the other party gains power that the entire democratic system will collapse and bring Armageddon?
That’s who you’re comparing against?
It’s also just often completely inaccurate. The standards it uses to cite works make them pretty much useless: any good information on Wikipedia is on there by accident.
Saudi Arabia doesn’t have the power to dick around with human rights halfway across the globe.
I too enjoy reading Western media instead of experiencing things first-hand.
You do realize that Tibetan independence was never recognized by any country, right? Not even the British.
Do you understand Tibetan history up to that point? At least it’s no longer a serfdom system (which Tibetan advocates will say was equal because of the one-in-a-million chance that one of the peasants can become the Dalai Lama and that everyone was totally happy because everyone was working towards bettering Buddhism). How many Tibetan refugees do you know who experienced serfdom?
Usually people would consider within a few degrees (1? 2? Certainly less than 5) to be an acceptable margin, but the pole itself is a well-defined point along the axis of rotation.
This is what happens when your incentive structure doesn’t reward actual proper journalism.
Might as well have quoted my own asshole
American media is legitimately just extremely unreliable. British, Chinese, Russian, French, German, Middle Eastern, and Southeast Asian sources all got the detail that the recent Indian moon mission landed near the South Pole, but most American media picked up that they had somehow landed on the South Pole and put that in their titles.
They were 21 degrees of latitude off, for reference.
Satellites have some degree of mobility and space junk follows trajectories that can be computed basically infinitely into the future.
Space junk is highly deterministic, though. No atmosphere to fuck with.
Why would Ford care when it can just petition the US government to block the sale of Chinese cars? It’s the same thing Boeing did to block Bombardier sales in the US.
It absolutely is, even if your particular instance hasn’t been. Lemmy.world probably takes the brunt of it.
Does that claim remove the existence of conflict of interest?
If you feel like giving China a domestic supply of O&G so they can switch their coal plants to gas ones, be my guest.
That’s been the single greatest contributor to reduced emissions in North America and Europe over the past few decades.
State funding describes a conflict of interest, whether perceived or actual.
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.