When is it a bad thing to encourage best practices on the Internet to verify sources and recognize signs of LLM slop? They took the time to explain why it’s better to get a direct source and avoid middlemen. That’s not “defensive”.
Your argument is that they simply could have searched for additional sources, but I think you’ve proven the point that simply searching without verifying is likely to yield garbage.
There’s no disparaging OP here unless they are the author of the article. But I believe that the article is being properly criticized for the things it does wrong.








The pessimist in me wonders if those 30% of Republicans simply don’t know what erratic means.