balderdash to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 3 months agoI'm doing my part!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.91Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.88Karrow-down1imageI'm doing my part!lemmy.zipbalderdash to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-square@weissbinder@feddit.orglinkfedilink3•3 months agoPrivate Jets are not the problem. The top 1% must be outlawed.
minus-square@buttnugget@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•3 months agoI would say both. Multifaceted approach. If there’s a legitimate use case for private jets, maybe they could be allowed once we’ve transitioned to clean energy.
minus-square@Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-3•3 months agowe’re all online on a computer. Aren’t we the global 1%?
minus-squareTensileSparklinkfedilink2•3 months agoIt looks like about 68% of the world has internet access so I would say no. Source
minus-square@Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-1•3 months agoAnd they also would own a computer and likely a rental or mortgage. You only need to be making $60000 a year to be considered the global 1%
Private Jets are not the problem. The top 1% must be outlawed.
I would say both. Multifaceted approach. If there’s a legitimate use case for private jets, maybe they could be allowed once we’ve transitioned to clean energy.
we’re all online on a computer. Aren’t we the global 1%?
It looks like about 68% of the world has internet access so I would say no. Source
And they also would own a computer and likely a rental or mortgage. You only need to be making $60000 a year to be considered the global 1%