• I’m talking about how you said (A)B for A=3 B=-6 equals -3

    No, that’s not what I said, since that’s not what you said. You didn’t write (A)B where A=3 and B=-6, you wrote (3)-6, which is 3-6 (the brackets are redundant as they are 2 terms separated by an operator), which is -3. If you intended this to be interpreted as a single term then you should’ve written (3)(-6), which is -18. Alternatively, if you had written (3)6, that would be equal to 18, but you wrote (3)-6, which is 2 terms separated by a minus. You wrote (A)-B, not (A)B (or (A)(B)), and so I read it as (A)-B.

    The syntax can be ambiguous.

    No, it’s not. Now that I know what you mean, you just failed to write it the way you apparently intended - you didn’t follow the syntax rules for multiplying by a negative.

    but the concept of distribution does not exist within in RPN

    So what you’re really saying, as far as I can tell, is brackets themselves don’t exist in RPN.

    evaluating a parenthetical gets the same result as distribution

    Except when it doesn’t, which is my original point.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      So what you’re really saying, as far as I can tell, is brackets themselves don’t exist in RPN.

      As far as you can tell. Really. Like it’s an oblique implication, and not the next sentence.

      If this is the rate you absorb information when it’s repeatedly laid out in plain fucking English, I’m not sure we’ll live long enough for you to grasp why your original point was off-topic. Good day.

      • As far as you can tell. Really. Like it’s an oblique implication

        Indeed there was an oblique implication in me saying “as far as I can tell”, but you seemed to miss it (I was wording it in a polite way, rather than being downright rude like a lot of people in here seem to have no trouble with at all, but water off a duck’s back…).

        your original point was off-topic

        The OP was about an e-calculator giving the wrong answer, so I don’t see how explaining why it’s doing that is off-topic (in your view).

        Good day

        Bye now.