"UPDATE table_name SET w = $1, x = $2, z = $4 WHERE y = $3 RETURNING *",

does not do the same as

"UPDATE table_name SET w = $1, x = $2, y = $3, z = $4 RETURNING *",

It’s 2 am and my mind blanked out the WHERE, and just wanted the numbers neatly in order of 1234.

idiot.

FML.

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This doesn’t help you but may help others. I always run my updates and deletes as selects first, validate the results are what I want including their number and then change the select to delete, update, whatever

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re not the first. You won’t be the last. I’m just glad my DB of choice uses transactions by default, so I can see “rows updated: 3,258,123” and back the fuck out of it.

    I genuinely believe that UPDATE and DELETE without a WHERE clause should be considered a syntax error. If you want to do all rows for some reason, it should have been something like UPDATE table SET field=value ALL.