The shortfall threatens to force the state’s deepest spending cuts in a decade.

California’s budget deficit has swelled to a record $68 billion after months of unexpectedly low tax revenues, a shortfall that could prompt the state’s deepest spending cuts since the Great Recession.

The latest deficit figure — calculated by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office and released Thursday — far exceeds the $14.3 billion estimate from June. The shortfall, which is the highest in dollar terms but not as a percentage of overall spending, threatens to upend the upcoming legislative year by forcing Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers to make spending cuts on a scale few term-limited elected officials in Sacramento have faced.

While not minimizing the shortfall, state budget analysts said California has options to address the deficit — including the use of cash reserves, one-time cuts in spending and changes to the way it funds education — that it didn’t have in previous downturns.

  • Haagel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t they have a surplus a few years ago? What the hell happened? Is the decrease in tax revenue because of the exodus?

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even with this budget shortfall, California will still probably have more tax revenue than the next 2 states, New York and Texas, combined. In the article it says the previous surplus may be used to fill this gap, minimizing the impact to spending

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s definitely not the exodus people make it out to be. But it is the first time California has had a negative growth rate. And a half million people leaving is certainly not nothing.

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That exodus could also very well be people who came from out of state to work and now that work is paused they have to head back to their home state because they don’t have money.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      State money comes from tax payers and companies making a bunch of money. Increased interest rates (reducing spending and therefore income), and stock market dip in the middle of the year means less money. My vague understanding is that the state doesn’t have an amazing way to hold over money for the swinginess of the income the state brings in. That being said, they do store some money for this kind of situation (and did during that surplus year) but the swings can be too drastic to adequately save for based on current policies.

      • MahnaMahna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another possible explanation I heard involved the tech sector, which made massive profits at the beginning of COVID and then took a dive afterwards when people started venturing out of the house and using their services less. It’s not the only factor in the revenue loss, of course, but I bet it was a not-insignificant chunk of change.