• Little_mouse@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    It almost makes me want to push for an advertising freeze on anyone who can’t or won’t prove their ID and age.

    But I know it won’t actually result in companies lobbying against requiring ID, it would just result in them lobbying to advertise more directly to children.

      • Little_mouse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think ads for gambling, drugs, fad diets etc. Should be shown to anyone. But I especially think that they (or any advertising) should be knowingly shown to children.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      So right, advertising is manipulation, always has been, it’s propaganda if it’s political. Both propaganda and manipulation are considered immoral widely, but your average social media company gets a pass. Why? I posit good advertising (sigh), and lobbying. Fuck that.

  • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is about protecting kids… from knowledge on how to commit suicide as effectively as possible so you can serve them more ads in the meantime.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    No one makes any money if you die (and undertakers are if nothing else, patient).

    But if you hate yourself in just the right way… you will consume

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe, especially in the US, but if you do any thinking about it in this case it’s obviously incompetence.

        People who disagree just can’t imagine that people might have different beliefs regarding the efficacy of technological controls.