• theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    by trying to go with “i know you are but what am i”, you just prove how childish your belief in him is

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually, failing to address any of my points and just hammering on the “Musk bad” seems childish to me.

      • theodewere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        you have no points… i’ve seen their numbers… the subscriber growth is non-existent… revenue is abysmal… the costs are exactly exorbitant… there is nothing to hide… it is a failure hoping for a rescue… think what you like…

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          the subscriber growth is non-existent

          WTF are you on about?

          In January of 2022 SL had about 245,000 subscribers. In January of 2023 they had 1,000,000 subscribers. In September of 2023 SL had over 2,000,000 subscribers. They’ve increased by a factor of 10 in less than 24 months and doubled in the last 9!

          Musk is an ass but what your saying about SL just isn’t true.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s what Starship is for. A giant, cheap, stainless steel space truck built by blue collar welders that will vomit out hundreds of them before returning to Earth intact to pick up some more.

          The whole Mars thing is just for PR. He has a different use for it. That thing ain’t ever making it to Mars.

            • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Cryo boiloff for long duration missions hasn’t been solved, for one. Have you seen how much it vents just sitting on the pad?

              • Balex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Fair enough. Starship is still in its infancy though so I wouldn’t completely give up hope yet.

                • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to be proven wrong and see it succeed, but it takes a LOT more than welding together a steel soda can with engines to get there.

            • Balex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You have yet to actually provide any counter points other than plugging your ears and saying “Nu uh!”

                • Balex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Apparently you don’t know how to have a conversation… Doing a quick search it seems like Starlink is around the break even point for operating costs and revenue, so if you’d like to provide sources to refute that, that’d be great.