I ll start : I have been following a pretty known tech/Linux journalist, and always found he is a fun dude to listen to, with interesting tech takes

The fact that he is also very openly “american conservative” (aka, religious & weapon nut, anti abortion, etc) annoys me, but i keep those things separate. And he does keep it separate too (politics channel vs tech channel), which is a great decision.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wish the Democrats in the US were less willfully ignorant about firearms so they’d pass less stupid and ineffectual legislation out of fear and/or pandering.

    Every time California passes an “assault weapons ban” that targets a specific ergonomic feature (pistol grips, removable magazines, what the hell ever they’re focusing on now) and gun manufacturers find a work around before the bill even comes into effect, I just roll my eyes.

    At this point I’m forced to assume it’s purely performative.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        ForgottenWeapons and InRangeTV are the only channels I still subscribe to, because they’re not constantly bitching about gun laws and parroting conservative talking points.

        The one time I’ve actually seen Ian make a statement about pending legislation, and he’s coming at it from a very respectable angle, saying basically “this law is poorly worded and over-inclusive and I think it’s going to cause some serious issues”: https://youtube.com/shorts/aMHGtM051jc?si=nvB2q2vktbwBuULq

        I mean, it’s exactly what I was talking about. Politicians pushing terrible firearms legislation out of willful ignorance.

        All it does is annoy and inconvenience lawful gun owners, and push the center-right further towards the MAGA crowd.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t matter. If liberals and centrists did nothing, they’d just fabricate that they were coming for guns. It’s a cult. Facts and Reason don’t come into it.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I too wish they could pass real gun control legislation that would result in less weapons on the streets and in people’s homes.

      Unfortunately, all we can ever get passed are bs laws that gun nuts won’t bother to fight against, considering the massive amounts of political spending on “single-issue” voters that care more about being able to shoot their neighbors than they care about living under a democratic-elected government.

      I mean, who needs functioning institutions when you have a fuckin gun?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Can’t they just ban auto/semi-auto? Or if those aren’t strict categories, define them, eg. “cannot shoot more than x bullets / second”? That one would likely be too broad but you get the idea.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Banning would piss off a lot of people. It’d be better to just place more restrictions on semi autos. Outright bans are very politically expensive.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Auto is banned. Everything is semi auto except bolt action rifles. All handguns are semi auto.