• eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    29 days ago

    it’s hard to know what to make of sachs sometimes.

    on one hand, he warns of things that end up coming true and on the other hand he committed some of those acts.

    • Ildsaye [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Realists are a type of right-winger who have some capability of engaging with the material facts, at least in the military and economic spheres. Even though their interest in the truth halts well-short of making them anti-capitalists, their rhetoric still annoys the true believers in classical economics and militarist triumphalism, and poses the hazard of providing just enough clarity that proletarian listeners who don’t share their class interests may connect the rest of the dots. Realists are therefore increasingly left to analyze from the sidelines as capitalism sinks into its late stage, even though they have the potential to be the most competent imperial managers. They can be seductive to right-wing socialists, who may fail to recognize when the Realist’s ideology diverges from Marxism.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        i think that this describes the ACP nicely and i wonder if it also describes others like piker, or platner, or al sayed.

        • Ildsaye [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          The difference is that the Realists neither consider themselves socialists nor pose as them. They are explicitly anticommunists; but they can be wily and clear-eyed enough to mingle with the compatible left for their own purposes.