If they made a declaration of israel committing genocide and calling for a stop and entrance of food and water, all members would be forced to uphold the convention to stop genocide. All the ICJ did was call it “plausible”.
They asked for years extra to “investigate” the claims. Because reading 84 pages in one month is too much work.
It is unlikely the ICJ ruling would be upheld if they called for action, but at least the ICJ would have done it’s part. Now they are just complicit.
I mean, the ICJ can’t exactly enforce a ceasefire - it’s a “you and what army” situation.
If they made a declaration of israel committing genocide and calling for a stop and entrance of food and water, all members would be forced to uphold the convention to stop genocide. All the ICJ did was call it “plausible”.
They asked for years extra to “investigate” the claims. Because reading 84 pages in one month is too much work.
It is unlikely the ICJ ruling would be upheld if they called for action, but at least the ICJ would have done it’s part. Now they are just complicit.